Milena Pinto
Impact in
- Clinical Biochemistry top 1%
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
- Aging top 5%
Papers in
-
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 21
- ATP Synthase and ATPases Research 5
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 4
-
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 6
- Co-authors
- Carlos T. Moraes (24 shared papers)Sandra R. Bacman (6 shared papers)Siôn L. Williams (4 shared papers)Susana Peralta (4 shared papers)Alicia M. Pickrell (9 shared papers)Nadee Nissanka (6 shared papers)Aline Hida (3 shared papers)Stefano Gustincich (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuroscience (4 papers)Human Molecular Genetics (3 papers)Nature Medicine (2 papers)Free Radical Biology and Medicine (2 papers)Cell Death and Differentiation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalySpain
In The Last Decade
Milena Pinto
32 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Biochemistry 339
- Aging 55
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Neurology 254
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 275
Countries citing papers authored by Milena Pinto
This map shows the geographic impact of Milena Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Milena Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Milena Pinto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Milena Pinto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Milena Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Milena Pinto. The network helps show where Milena Pinto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Milena Pinto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 314 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 212 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 200 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 144 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 96 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 92 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 76 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 53 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 47 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 46 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 21 |
About Milena Pinto
Milena Pinto is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Physiology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (21 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (339 citations), Aging (55 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations), Neurology (254 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (275 citations). Milena Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Carlos T. Moraes, Sandra R. Bacman, Siôn L. Williams, Susana Peralta, Alicia M. Pickrell, Nadee Nissanka, Aline Hida, Stefano Gustincich, Marta Biagioli and Hirokazu Fukui. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Human Molecular Genetics, Nature Medicine, Free Radical Biology and Medicine and Cell Death and Differentiation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.