Elena Speretta

24.6k total citations
8 papers, 191 citations indexed

About

Elena Speretta is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elena Speretta has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 191 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Physiology and 3 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Elena Speretta's work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers). Elena Speretta is often cited by papers focused on Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers). Elena Speretta collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Elena Speretta's co-authors include Damian C. Crowther, Isabel Cardoso, Ana Rita Costa, Christopher M. Dobson, Leila M. Luheshi, Teresa P. Barros, Gian Gaetano Tartaglia, Sara Imarisio, Thomas R. Jahn and David A. Lomas and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cell Death and Differentiation and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease.

In The Last Decade

Elena Speretta

8 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Elena Speretta United Kingdom	6	95	83	48	34	25	8	191
Akiko Oda Japan	8	98 1.0×	111 1.3×	40 0.8×	24 0.7×	19 0.8×	15	245
Antonio Rivas-Domínguez Spain	6	79 0.8×	85 1.0×	63 1.3×	21 0.6×	32 1.3×	9	248
Eva Illes‐Toth United Kingdom	10	164 1.7×	127 1.5×	29 0.6×	44 1.3×	60 2.4×	19	340
Tomohiro Onishi Japan	7	154 1.6×	85 1.0×	60 1.3×	43 1.3×	8 0.3×	12	267
Nadine Michot France	5	96 1.0×	45 0.5×	91 1.9×	35 1.0×	62 2.5×	5	236
Marie Bourdon France	5	137 1.4×	157 1.9×	36 0.8×	32 0.9×	18 0.7×	9	289
Luca Sorrentino Italy	9	128 1.3×	54 0.7×	75 1.6×	16 0.5×	14 0.6×	18	295
Tania Mead United Kingdom	6	72 0.8×	44 0.5×	32 0.7×	38 1.1×	14 0.6×	6	170
Inge Snoeren Germany	5	110 1.2×	59 0.7×	25 0.5×	21 0.6×	7 0.3×	9	209
Moorthi Ponnusamy India	7	97 1.0×	148 1.8×	46 1.0×	43 1.3×	10 0.4×	7	264

Countries citing papers authored by Elena Speretta

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elena Speretta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elena Speretta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elena Speretta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elena Speretta

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elena Speretta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elena Speretta. The network helps show where Elena Speretta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elena Speretta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elena Speretta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elena Speretta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elena Speretta. Elena Speretta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Marygold, Steven J, Helen Attrill, Elena Speretta, et al.. (2020). The DNA polymerases of Drosophila melanogaster. Fly. 14(1-4). 49–61. 6 indexed citations

Courtot, Mélanie, Aleksandra Shypitsyna, Elena Speretta, et al.. (2015). UniProt-GOA: A Central Resource for Data Integration and GO Annotation.. 227–228. 4 indexed citations

Kruppa, Antonina J., Stanislav Ott, James A. Irving, et al.. (2013). Suppression of Aβ toxicity by puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase is independent of its proteolytic activity. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 1832(12). 2115–2126. 14 indexed citations

Speretta, Elena, Thomas R. Jahn, Gian Gaetano Tartaglia, et al.. (2012). Expression in Drosophila of Tandem Amyloid β Peptides Provides Insights into Links between Aggregation and Neurotoxicity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 287(24). 20748–20754. 35 indexed citations

Costa, Ana Rita, Elena Speretta, Damian C. Crowther, & Isabel Cardoso. (2011). Testing the Therapeutic Potential of Doxycycline in a Drosophila melanogaster Model of Alzheimer Disease. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286(48). 41647–41655. 63 indexed citations

Speretta, Elena, et al.. (2011). P2‐453: Testing the Therapeutic Potential of Doxycycline in a Drosophila melanogaster model of Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 7(4S_Part_13). 1 indexed citations

Brorsson, Ann‐Christin, Janet R. Kumita, Benedetta Bolognesi, et al.. (2010). Methods and models in neurodegenerative and systemic protein aggregation diseases.. PubMed. 15(1). 373–96. 21 indexed citations

Zucchelli, S., Sandra Vilotti, Raffaella Calligaris, et al.. (2008). Aggresome-forming TTRAP mediates pro-apoptotic properties of Parkinson's disease-associated DJ-1 missense mutations. Cell Death and Differentiation. 16(3). 428–438. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact