Michael Witmore

928 citations
15 papers · 252 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Digital Humanities and Scholarship 2
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 1
    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 3
    • History of Medicine Studies 2

Michael Witmore

13 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers

Michael Witmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Literature and Literary Theory 96
  • General Social Sciences 18
  • Geography, Planning and Development 26
  • Classics 11
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 54
Replace Andrew Piper with:
Andrew Piper Canada
Nicholas Dames United States
Katherine Bode Australia
Fotis Jannidis Germany
Jeffrey T. Schnapp United States
Richard Jean So United States
Paul Fyfe United States
Mike Kestemont Belgium
David Cooper United Kingdom
Elizabeth Maddock Dillon United States
Michael Witmore relative to Andrew Piper Canada Andrew Piper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Andrew Piper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Witmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Witmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Witmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Witmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Witmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Witmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Witmore. The network helps show where Michael Witmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Michael Witmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Witmore Line = papers co-authored together Michael Witmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201464
2 200146
3 201144
4 201034
5
Culture of Accidents: Unexpected Knowledges in Early Modern England
200127
6 201514
7 201312
8 20163
9 20102
10 20022
11 20121
12
Shakespeare's Inner Music
20101
13
Phenomenology and Sensation : Shakespeare, Sensation, and Renaissance Existentialism
20121
14 20141
15
The professional and linguistic communities of early modern dramatists
20160

About Michael Witmore

Michael Witmore is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 15 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (3 papers), History of Medicine Studies (2 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper) and Artificial Intelligence in Games (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (96 citations), General Social Sciences (18 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations), Classics (11 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (54 citations). Michael Witmore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Hope, Michael Gleicher, Franco Moretti, Matthew L. Jockers, David Loewenstein and Anupam Basu. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, New Literary History, Criticism, postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies and Albion A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact