New Literary History

1.8k papers and 13.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in New Literary History in the last decades have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations. Papers published in New Literary History usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (583 papers), Philosophy (364 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (324 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (79 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (72 papers) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Literary History are Bruno Latour, Wolfgang Iser, Roland Barthes, Dipesh Chakrabarty, John R. Searle, Toril Moi, Heather Love, Paul Ricœur, Stanley Fish and Fredric Jameson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Literary History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Literary History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Literary History.

Countries where authors publish in New Literary History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Literary History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Literary History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Literary History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025