Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions For Future Research1
20042.0k citationsMichael Wade et al.MIS Quarterlyprofile →
The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships1
2010392 citationsMichael Wade et al.MIS Quarterlyprofile →
Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: The role of social capital
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wade more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wade. The network helps show where Michael Wade may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Wade
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Wade.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Wade based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Wade. Michael Wade is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Obwegeser, Nikolaus, et al.. (2020). A double-edged Sword Named Agility: a Critical Perspective on Organizational responses to Environmental Disruption.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
Wade, Michael, et al.. (2010). The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships1. MIS Quarterly. 34(1). 163–183.392 indexed citations breakdown →
Wan, Zeying, Yulin Fang, & Michael Wade. (2007). A Ten-Year Odyssey of the 'IS Productivity Paradox' - A Citation Analysis (1996-2006). Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 437.22 indexed citations
Grannis, Shaun J., Michael Wade, P. Joseph Gibson, & J. Marc Overhage. (2006). The Indiana Public Health Emergency Surveillance System: ongoing progress, early findings, and future directions.. PubMed. 304–8.24 indexed citations
Wade, Michael, et al.. (2004). Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions For Future Research1. MIS Quarterly. 28(1). 107–142.1996 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Wade, Michael, et al.. (2002). Exploring the role of information systems in online success: a resource-based analysis.1 indexed citations
17.
Wade, Michael. (2001). EXPLORING THE ROLE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESOURCES IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 491–496.6 indexed citations
18.
Wade, Michael, Sabine Greulich, A. Monteiro, T. Vasconcelos, & L. Catarino. (1998). Luronium natans (L.) Rafin., a rare aquatic plant: an assessment of its status and changes over the last 100 years.. 147–150.2 indexed citations
19.
Wade, Michael. (1993). White on Black in South Africa : a study of English-language inscriptions of skin colour. St Martin's Press eBooks.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.