Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems
19873.0k citationsIzak Benbasat, David K. Goldstein et al.MIS Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by David K. Goldstein
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David K. Goldstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David K. Goldstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David K. Goldstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David K. Goldstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David K. Goldstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David K. Goldstein. The network helps show where David K. Goldstein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David K. Goldstein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David K. Goldstein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David K. Goldstein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David K. Goldstein. David K. Goldstein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Goldstein, David K.. (2011). The Effects of Structured Development Methods on the Job Satisfaction of Programmer/Analysts: A Theoretical Model. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
2.
Goldstein, David K.. (2011). A further examination of the determinants of job satisfaction in programmer/analysts. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
3.
Goldstein, David K.. (2010). Global Positioning Systems Wing : GPS IIR-20 (SVN-49) Information..
Goldstein, David K., et al.. (1991). Environment, strategy, and the use of computer-based data : case studies in product management. Marketing Science Institute eBooks.1 indexed citations
Goldstein, David K. & Michael H. Zack. (1988). THE IMPACT OF MARKETING INFORMATION SUPPLY ON PRODUCT MANAGERS: AN ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION PROCESSING PERSPECTIVE. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Benbasat, Izak, David K. Goldstein, & Melissa Mead. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly. 11(3). 369–386.3006 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Stokes, James, et al.. (1987). Application of expert systems in project management decision aiding. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).2 indexed citations
13.
Goldstein, David K.. (1985). Work-Related Correlates of Job Satisfaction in Programmer/Analysts: An Examination of Task Differences.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.