Michael Screen

658 total citations
10 papers, 431 citations indexed

About

Michael Screen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology and Immunology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Screen has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 431 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Immunology. Recurrent topics in Michael Screen's work include RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). Michael Screen is often cited by papers focused on RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). Michael Screen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Michael Screen's co-authors include Martin Turner, Alexei F. Kisselev, Sondra L. Downey-Kopyscinski, Martijn Verdoes, Alexandre A. Pletnev, Herman S. Overkleeft, Daniel J. Hodson, Robert Tokhunts, Omar Amir and Dennis L. Wright and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Michael Screen

9 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Michael Screen

MB

ONCOL

CR

HEMAT

IMMUN

Chih-Shia Lee United States

Shiho Fujiwara Japan

Abdellatif Amri Canada

Tatiana Shorstova Canada

Helen Pak Canada

Jasper E. Neggers United States

Ling Sun China

Chiel Maas Netherlands

Sigrid Reichardt Germany

Anna Wojtuszkiewicz Netherlands

Chih-Shia Lee United States

Michael Screen

355 ×0.9

MB

139 ×1.1

ONCOL

65 ×0.9

CR

44 ×0.6

HEMAT

28 ×0.5

IMMUN

Citations per year, relative to Michael Screen Michael Screen (= 1×) peers Chih-Shia Lee

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Screen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Screen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Screen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Screen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Screen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Screen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Screen. The network helps show where Michael Screen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Screen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Screen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Screen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Screen. Michael Screen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Salerno, Fiamma, Louise S. Matheson, William S. Foster, et al.. (2025). RNA binding proteins control the G ₂ -M checkpoint of the germinal center B cell. Science Immunology. 10(112). eadu3718–eadu3718.

2.

Salerno, Fiamma, Andrew J.M. Howden, Louise S. Matheson, et al.. (2023). An integrated proteome and transcriptome of B cell maturation defines poised activation states of transitional and mature B cells. Nature Communications. 14(1). 5116–5116. 13 indexed citations

3.

Screen, Michael, Louise S. Matheson, Andrew J.M. Howden, et al.. (2023). RNA helicase EIF4A1-mediated translation is essential for the GC response. Life Science Alliance. 7(2). e202302301–e202302301. 3 indexed citations

4.

Turner, David J., Alexander Saveliev, Fiamma Salerno, et al.. (2022). A functional screen of RNA binding proteins identifies genes that promote or limit the accumulation of CD138+ plasma cells. eLife. 11. 12 indexed citations

5.

Hodson, Daniel J., Michael Screen, & Martin Turner. (2019). RNA-binding proteins in hematopoiesis and hematological malignancy. Blood. 133(22). 2365–2373. 43 indexed citations

6.

Monzón‐Casanova, Elisa, Michael Screen, Manuel D. Díaz‐Muñoz, et al.. (2018). The RNA-binding protein PTBP1 is necessary for B cell selection in germinal centers. Nature Immunology. 19(3). 267–278. 63 indexed citations

7.

Sbarrato, Thomas, Kirsti Hill, Ruth V. Spriggs, et al.. (2013). A role for eukaryotic initiation factor 4B overexpression in the pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 28(5). 1092–1102. 52 indexed citations

8.

Shabaneh, Tamer B., et al.. (2013). Molecular Basis of Differential Sensitivity of Myeloma Cells to Clinically Relevant Bolus Treatment with Bortezomib. PLoS ONE. 8(2). e56132–e56132. 46 indexed citations

9.

Screen, Michael, Sondra L. Downey-Kopyscinski, Martijn Verdoes, et al.. (2010). Nature of Pharmacophore Influences Active Site Specificity of Proteasome Inhibitors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285(51). 40125–40134. 55 indexed citations

10.

Downey-Kopyscinski, Sondra L., Michael Screen, Alexandre A. Pletnev, et al.. (2009). Selective Inhibitor of Proteasome's Caspase-like Sites Sensitizes Cells to Specific Inhibition of Chymotrypsin-like Sites. Chemistry & Biology. 16(12). 1278–1289. 144 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact