Countries where authors publish in Science Immunology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science Immunology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science Immunology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science Immunology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Science Immunology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science Immunology.
About Science Immunology
The 851 papers published in Science Immunology in the last decades have received a total of 48.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Science Immunology usually cover Immunology (661 papers), Oncology (150 papers), Infectious Diseases (98 papers), Virology (16 papers) and Immunology and Allergy (19 papers) specifically the topics of Immune Cell Function and Interaction (385 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (287 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (175 papers), IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways (96 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (79 papers), Immune cells in cancer (61 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (60 papers) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science Immunology are Stephanie C. Eisenbarth, Adam Williams, Steven M. Lewis, Michael Diamond, Dorian B. McGavern, Donna L. Färber, Carolyn B. Coyne, Stephanie E. Ander, Michelle Miron and Peter A. Szabo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.