Michael Scaife

593 total citations
8 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

Michael Scaife is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Scaife has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Michael Scaife's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers). Michael Scaife is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers). Michael Scaife collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Michael Scaife's co-authors include Yvonne Rogers, Matt Davies, Frances Aldrich, Mike Van Duuren, George Butterworth, John Halloran and Sara Price and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Developmental Psychology, European Journal of Psychology of Education and Early Child Development and Care.

In The Last Decade

Michael Scaife

7 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Scaife United Kingdom	7	178	138	125	91	67	8	438
Lisa Sherman United States	7	135 0.8×	122 0.9×	150 1.2×	71 0.8×	49 0.7×	14	517
Carina Girvan Ireland	8	138 0.8×	253 1.8×	157 1.3×	66 0.7×	63 0.9×	21	527
Gökçe Elif Baykal Türkiye	10	153 0.9×	127 0.9×	67 0.5×	88 1.0×	43 0.6×	41	338
Erik Strommen United States	13	145 0.8×	245 1.8×	121 1.0×	38 0.4×	138 2.1×	25	654
Leslie Jarmon United States	8	229 1.3×	180 1.3×	187 1.5×	39 0.4×	94 1.4×	17	491
Yoram Chisik United States	10	157 0.9×	75 0.5×	40 0.3×	45 0.5×	38 0.6×	28	256
Anne Jelfs United Kingdom	11	68 0.4×	278 2.0×	102 0.8×	80 0.9×	63 0.9×	18	455
Emma Mercier United States	15	117 0.7×	362 2.6×	366 2.9×	112 1.2×	74 1.1×	50	827
Pedro F. Hernández-Ramos United States	10	63 0.4×	306 2.2×	161 1.3×	40 0.4×	155 2.3×	19	568
Rinat B. Rosenberg‐Kima Israel	10	64 0.4×	121 0.9×	163 1.3×	95 1.0×	68 1.0×	26	534

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Scaife

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Scaife's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Scaife with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Scaife more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Scaife

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Scaife. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Scaife. The network helps show where Michael Scaife may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Scaife

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Scaife. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Scaife based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Scaife. Michael Scaife is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Rogers, Yvonne, Michael Scaife, Frances Aldrich, & Sara Price. (2003). Improving Children's Understanding of Formalisms through Interacting with Multimedia. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).

2.

Scaife, Michael, John Halloran, & Yvonne Rogers. (2002). Let's Work Together: Supporting Two-Party Collaborations with New Forms of Shared Interactive Representations.. UCL Discovery (University College London). 123–138. 23 indexed citations

3.

Scaife, Michael, Yvonne Rogers, Frances Aldrich, & Matt Davies. (1997). Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. 343–350. 272 indexed citations

4.

Duuren, Mike Van & Michael Scaife. (1996). “Because a robot's brain hasn't got a brain, it just controls itself” — Children's attributions of brain related behaviour to intelligent artefacts. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 11(4). 365–376. 19 indexed citations

5.

Scaife, Michael & Mike Van Duuren. (1995). Do computers have brains? What children believe about intelligent artifacts. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 13(4). 367–377. 46 indexed citations

6.

Duuren, Mike Van & Michael Scaife. (1995). How do children represent intelligent technology?. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 10(3). 289–301. 7 indexed citations

7.

Scaife, Michael, et al.. (1991). Developmental changes in childrens’ use of computer input devices. Early Child Development and Care. 69(1). 19–38. 24 indexed citations

8.

Butterworth, George, et al.. (1985). Evolution and developmental psychology. St Martin's Press eBooks. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact