MacDonald P. Jackson
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 8
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History 4
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 3
-
- Authorship Attribution and Profiling 6
-
- Irish and British Studies 3
- Australian History and Society 2
-
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 2
-
- New Zealand Economic and Social Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Brian BoydJohn MarstonMichael NeillWilliam ShakespeareGary TaylorVincent O’SullivanThomas MiddletonDavid Carnegie
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2 papers)Pacific Affairs (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- New Zealand
In The Last Decade
MacDonald P. Jackson
17 papers receiving 69 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Literature and Literary Theory 53
- Classics 14
- Music 6
- Artificial Intelligence 57
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 5
Countries citing papers authored by MacDonald P. Jackson
This map shows the geographic impact of MacDonald P. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MacDonald P. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MacDonald P. Jackson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by MacDonald P. Jackson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by MacDonald P. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MacDonald P. Jackson. The network helps show where MacDonald P. Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside MacDonald P. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 6 | Vocabulary, Chronology, and the First Quarto (1603) of Hamlet | 2018 | 1 |
| 7 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 11 | A Lover’s Complaint and the Claremont Shakespeare Clinic | 2013 | 3 |
| 12 | Parallels and Poetry: Shakespeare, Kyd, and Arden of Faversham | 2010 | 4 |
| 13 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 14 | A reconstructed text of Pericles, Prince of Tyre | 2003 | 5 |
| 15 | Defining Shakespeare: Pericles as Test Case | 2003 | 15 |
| 16 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 20 | The revenger's tragedy : a facsimile of the 1607/8 quarto | 1983 | 1 |
About MacDonald P. Jackson
MacDonald P. Jackson is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory and Music, having authored 29 papers that have together received 113 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (6 papers), Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers) and New Zealand Economic and Social Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (53 citations), Classics (14 citations) and Music (6 citations). MacDonald P. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Brian Boyd, John Marston, Michael Neill, William Shakespeare, Gary Taylor, Vincent O’Sullivan, Thomas Middleton and David Carnegie. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Pacific Affairs and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.