David Schalkwyk

438 total citations
43 papers, 135 citations indexed

About

David Schalkwyk is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, David Schalkwyk has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 135 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 11 papers in Philosophy and 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in David Schalkwyk's work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (12 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). David Schalkwyk is often cited by papers focused on Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (12 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). David Schalkwyk collaborates with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and Germany. David Schalkwyk's co-authors include Peter Erickson, Harry Berger and Michael Neill and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Journal of Southern African Studies and Language Sciences.

In The Last Decade

David Schalkwyk

31 papers receiving 76 citations

Peers

David Schalkwyk
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Literature and Literary Theory 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 48
  • Philosophy 21
  • History 17
  • Anthropology 15
Brenda R. Silver United Kingdom
Lynn A. Higgins United States
Morris Eaves United States
A. D. Nuttall United Kingdom
Neil Corcoran United Kingdom
Lynda E. Boose United States
Peter Schwenger Canada
Tom Paulin United States
Charles J. Rzepka
Derek Connon
Brenda R. Silver United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to David Schalkwyk
David Schalkwyk · 1×
Citations per year, relative to David Schalkwyk
David Schalkwyk · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by David Schalkwyk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schalkwyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schalkwyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schalkwyk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schalkwyk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schalkwyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schalkwyk. The network helps show where David Schalkwyk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Schalkwyk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Schalkwyk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Schalkwyk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Schalkwyk. David Schalkwyk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2
The Oxford handbook of Shakespearean tragedy
1
3 1
4 0
5
Special section, the achievement of Robert Weimann
1
6 0
7 0
8 3
9 0
10 1
11 2
12 3
13 1
14 7
15 28
16 0
17 3
18 1
19 0
20
Confession and solidarity in the prison writing of Breyten Breytenbach and Jeremy Cronin
8

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026