Michael Klenk
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Papers in
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 23
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 5
- Free Will and Agency 4
- Philosophy 11
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 9
- Co-authors
- Bernd KreikemeyerAndreas PodbielskiLothar SchweigererLudger Klein‐HitpaßDirk KoczanMasanobu NakataW. HaversJeroen Hopster
- Journals
- Philosophy & Technology (3 papers)Inquiry (2 papers)Ethics and Information Technology (2 papers)Oncogene (2 papers)Synthese (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
Michael Klenk
36 papers receiving 549 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Safety Research 75
- Cognitive Neuroscience 128
- Infectious Diseases 89
- Philosophy 47
- Neurology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Klenk
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Klenk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Klenk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Klenk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Klenk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Klenk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Klenk. The network helps show where Michael Klenk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Klenk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 12 | Prometheus' Legacy: Responsibility and Technology | 2020 | 4 |
| 13 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 14 | Autonomy and Online Manipulation | 2019 | 7 |
| 15 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 63 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 80 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 52 |
About Michael Klenk
Michael Klenk is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Safety Research, Information Systems and Management and Social Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (23 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (7 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers) and Free Will and Agency (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (75 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (128 citations), Infectious Diseases (89 citations), Philosophy (47 citations) and Neurology (61 citations). Michael Klenk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Kreikemeyer, Andreas Podbielski, Lothar Schweigerer, Ludger Klein‐Hitpaß, Dirk Koczan, Masanobu Nakata, W. Havers, Jeroen Hopster, Garrett M. Brodeur and Angelika Eggert. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy & Technology, Inquiry, Ethics and Information Technology, Oncogene and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.