Philosophy & Technology

780 papers and 11.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 780 papers published in Philosophy & Technology in the last decades have received a total of 11.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophy & Technology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (302 papers), Safety Research (276 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (200 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (274 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (196 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophy & Technology are Luciano Floridi, J. Arol Simpson, John Danaher, Tamar Sharon, Shannon Vallor, Carlos Zednik, P.B. de Laat, Mark Coeckelbergh, Pak‐Hang Wong and Reuben Binns.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophy & Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy & Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy & Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophy & Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy & Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy & Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy & Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025