Debra Mathews

3.0k total citations
62 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Debra Mathews is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Debra Mathews has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 22 papers in Physiology and 19 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Debra Mathews's work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (22 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (19 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (9 papers). Debra Mathews is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (22 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (19 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (9 papers). Debra Mathews collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Debra Mathews's co-authors include Juli Bollinger, Alan Regenberg, Evan E. Eichler, Aravinda Chakravarti, Nila Shah, Carl Kashuk, Minerva M. Carrasquillo, Janet A. Warrington, David J. Cutler and Michael E. Zwick and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Debra Mathews

61 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Debra Mathews United States 16 467 266 253 178 165 62 1.1k
Alice Park United States 13 534 1.1× 78 0.3× 73 0.3× 298 1.7× 140 0.8× 85 1.2k
Luis G. Carvajal‐Carmona United States 21 429 0.9× 138 0.5× 208 0.8× 511 2.9× 36 0.2× 64 1.6k
Guido de Wert Netherlands 28 583 1.2× 191 0.7× 575 2.3× 421 2.4× 158 1.0× 95 2.0k
Jung A Kim South Korea 22 315 0.7× 94 0.4× 168 0.7× 118 0.7× 28 0.2× 130 1.7k
Jill O. Robinson United States 20 119 0.3× 117 0.4× 412 1.6× 752 4.2× 98 0.6× 70 1.2k
Jennifer A. Sullivan United States 23 416 0.9× 463 1.7× 170 0.7× 769 4.3× 136 0.8× 51 1.7k
Joanna M. Watson United States 19 460 1.0× 76 0.3× 218 0.9× 171 1.0× 105 0.6× 37 1.9k
Sven Bocklandt United States 13 862 1.8× 116 0.4× 72 0.3× 393 2.2× 59 0.4× 16 1.5k
Robert G. Resta United States 23 271 0.6× 42 0.2× 234 0.9× 954 5.4× 70 0.4× 68 2.5k
Beverly M. Yashar United States 24 1.1k 2.4× 47 0.2× 151 0.6× 561 3.2× 40 0.2× 67 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Mathews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Mathews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Mathews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Mathews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Mathews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Mathews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Mathews. The network helps show where Debra Mathews may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra Mathews

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra Mathews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra Mathews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra Mathews. Debra Mathews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wright, Robert A., et al.. (2024). Participant Contributions to Person-Generated Health Data Research Using Mobile Devices: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 27. e51955–e51955. 2 indexed citations
2.
Mathews, Debra, Amy P. Abernethy, Elliot L. Chaikof, et al.. (2023). https://nam.edu/regenerative-medicine-case-study-for-understanding-and-anticipating-emerging-science-and-technology/. NAM Perspectives. 11(15). 2 indexed citations
3.
Ryan, Kerry A., et al.. (2023). Genomic testing in voluntary workplace wellness programs in the US: Evidence and challenges. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 11(11). e2245–e2245. 6 indexed citations
5.
Mathews, Debra, Amy P. Abernethy, Elliot L. Chaikof, et al.. (2023). Regenerative Medicine: Case Study for Understanding and Anticipating Emerging Science and Technology. NAM Perspectives. 11(15). 1 indexed citations
6.
Sherkow, Jacob S., Katharine Barker, Irus Braverman, et al.. (2022). Ethical, legal, and social issues in the Earth BioGenome Project. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(4). 13 indexed citations
7.
Mathews, Debra, et al.. (2021). Microsatellite Markers in Biobanking: A New Multiplexed Assay. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 19(5). 438–443. 3 indexed citations
8.
Clark, Amander T., Ali H. Brivanlou, Jianping Fu, et al.. (2021). Human embryo research, stem cell-derived embryo models and in vitro gametogenesis: Considerations leading to the revised ISSCR guidelines. Stem Cell Reports. 16(6). 1416–1424. 76 indexed citations
9.
Morain, Stephanie R., Debra Mathews, Gail Geller, et al.. (2021). Identification and management of pragmatic clinical trial collateral findings: A current understanding and directions for future research. Healthcare. 9(4). 100586–100586. 4 indexed citations
10.
Bonham, Vence L., Ellen Wright Clayton, Stephanie Johnson, et al.. (2021). Ethical issues in genetics and infectious diseases research: An interdisciplinary expert review. Ethics Medicine and Public Health. 18. 100684–100684. 3 indexed citations
11.
Bollinger, Juli, et al.. (2021). Patients' perspectives on the derivation and use of organoids. Stem Cell Reports. 16(8). 1874–1883. 28 indexed citations
12.
Geller, Gail, Priya Duggal, Chloe L. Thio, et al.. (2020). Genomics in the era of COVID-19: ethical implications for clinical practice and public health. Genome Medicine. 12(1). 95–95. 7 indexed citations
13.
Bollinger, Juli, Gail Geller, Kevin P. Weinfurt, et al.. (2020). Patients’ Views About the Disclosure of Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: a Focus Group Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 35(12). 3436–3442. 5 indexed citations
14.
Ziniel, Sonja I., Sarah Savage, Kurt D. Christensen, et al.. (2018). Enhancing Autonomy in Biobank Decisions: Too Much of a Good Thing?. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 13(2). 125–138. 5 indexed citations
15.
Mathews, Debra, Sarah Chan, Peter J. Donovan, et al.. (2015). CRISPR: A path through the thicket. Nature. 527(7577). 159–161. 15 indexed citations
16.
Bollinger, Juli, et al.. (2014). Patients’ Attitudes toward the Donation of Biological Materials for the Derivation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell stem cell. 14(1). 9–12. 22 indexed citations
17.
Mathews, Debra, Robert Cook‐Deegan, & Tania Bubela. (2013). Patents and Misplaced Angst: Lessons for Translational Stem Cell Research from Genomics. Cell stem cell. 12(5). 508–512. 6 indexed citations
18.
Rabins, Peter V., Brian S. Appleby, Jason Brandt, et al.. (2009). Scientific and Ethical Issues Related to Deep Brain Stimulation for Disorders of Mood, Behavior, and Thought. Archives of General Psychiatry. 66(9). 931–931. 119 indexed citations
19.
Mathews, Debra, Peter J. Donovan, John Harris, et al.. (2009). Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Gametes: Truth and (Potential) Consequences. Cell stem cell. 5(1). 11–14. 42 indexed citations
20.
Mathews, Debra, Andrea L. Kalfoglou, & Kathy Hudson. (2005). Geneticists' views on science policy formation and public outreach. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 137A(2). 161–169. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026