Michael Fausnaugh
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Computational Mechanics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- G. RickerR. VanderspekC. S. KochanekAvi ShporerW. FongNatalia GuerreroChelsea X. HuangB. J. Shappee
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (27 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (16 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (11 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael Fausnaugh
36 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 524
- Instrumentation 216
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 64
- Computational Mechanics 36
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 16
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Fausnaugh
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Fausnaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Fausnaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Fausnaugh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Fausnaugh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Fausnaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Fausnaugh. The network helps show where Michael Fausnaugh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Fausnaugh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Fausnaugh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Fausnaugh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Fausnaugh. Michael Fausnaugh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | Tess data for asteroseismology: Timing verification | 3 |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | TESS-Point: High precision TESS pointing tool | 3 |
| 18 | HD 191939: Three Sub-Neptunes Transiting a Sun-like Star Only 54 pc Away | 8 |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Michael Fausnaugh
Michael Fausnaugh is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (27 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (16 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (216 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (524 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (64 citations). Michael Fausnaugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include G. Ricker, R. Vanderspek, C. S. Kochanek, Avi Shporer, W. Fong, Natalia Guerrero, Chelsea X. Huang, B. J. Shappee, Andrew Vanderburg and Liang Yu. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.