David W. Latham
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.05%
- Instrumentation top 0.05%
- Computational Mechanics top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Bruce W. CarneyR. P. StefanikGuillermo TorresJohn B. LairdGilbert A. EsquerdoRobert D. MathieuTimothy M. BrownT. Mazeh
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (271 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (174 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (140 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
David W. Latham
332 papers receiving 10.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 10.3k
- Instrumentation 4.4k
- Computational Mechanics 550
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 453
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 420
Countries citing papers authored by David W. Latham
This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Latham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Latham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Latham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Latham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Latham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Latham. The network helps show where David W. Latham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David W. Latham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David W. Latham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David W. Latham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David W. Latham. David W. Latham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | The Mass of the White Dwarf Companion in the Self-lensing Binary KOI-3278: Einstein versus Newton | 4 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 171 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | HARPS-N: A New Tool for Characterizing Kepler Planets | 1 |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | Spectroscopic Binaries in M67 | 1 |
| 20 | Large-scale structures and peculiar motions in the universe | 29 |
About David W. Latham
David W. Latham is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 357 papers that have together received 10.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (271 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (174 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (140 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (4.4k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (10.3k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (453 citations). David W. Latham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Bruce W. Carney, R. P. Stefanik, Guillermo Torres, John B. Laird, Gilbert A. Esquerdo, Robert D. Mathieu, Timothy M. Brown, T. Mazeh, David Charbonneau and Mark E. Everett. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.