Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
KeplerPresearch Data Conditioning II - A Bayesian Approach to Systematic Error Correction
2012349 citationsJeffrey C. Smith, Jon M. Jenkins et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Barclay
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Barclay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Barclay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Barclay more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Barclay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Barclay. The network helps show where Thomas Barclay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Barclay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Barclay.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Barclay based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Barclay. Thomas Barclay is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fausnaugh, Michael, Rahul Jayaraman, R. Vanderspek, et al.. (2023). Observations of GRB 230307A by TESS. Research Notes of the AAS. 7(3). 56–56.6 indexed citations
Burke, Christopher J., Michael Fausnaugh, R. Vanderspek, et al.. (2020). TESS-Point: High precision TESS pointing tool. Astrophysics Source Code Library.3 indexed citations
14.
Dotson, Jessie, Geert Barentsen, Christina Hedges, et al.. (2019). Lightkurve v1.0: Kepler, K2, and TESS time series analysis in Python. 233.1 indexed citations
15.
Colón, Knicole D., Daniel Angerhausen, Thomas Barclay, et al.. (2019). Testing the Hypothesis of a Low Metallicity Atmosphere for the Extremely Inflated Sub-Saturn-Mass Planet KELT-11b. 15926.2 indexed citations
16.
Cardoso, José Vinícius de Miranda, Christina Hedges, Michael Gully-Santiago, et al.. (2018). Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python. Astrophysics Source Code Library.174 indexed citations
17.
Mullally, Fergal, Thomas Barclay, & Geert Barentsen. (2016). K2fov: Field of view software for NASA's K2 mission. Astrophysics Source Code Library.5 indexed citations
18.
Barbary, K., Thomas Barclay, Rahul Biswas, et al.. (2016). SNCosmo: Python library for supernova cosmology. Astrophysics Source Code Library.13 indexed citations
19.
Still, Martin & Thomas Barclay. (2012). PyKE: Reduction and analysis of Kepler Simple Aperture Photometry data. Astrophysics Source Code Library.37 indexed citations
20.
Barclay, Thomas, Susan E. Thompson, Susan E. Mullally, et al.. (2012). Heartbeat Stars: A Class Of Tidally Excited Eccentric Binaries. 219.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.