Michael B. Hay

52 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Michael B. Hay
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Business and International Management 400
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 634
  • Accounting 429
  • Organic Chemistry 798
Replace Haiyang Li with:
Haiyang Li China
Matthias Baum Germany
Ashok Kumar Gupta India
Christian D. Schade Germany
Don Scott Australia
Matthew B. Myers Australia
Frank Wilkinson United Kingdom
Jianjun Zhang China
Matthias Weber Austria
John Freeman United States
Michael B. Hay relative to Haiyang Li China Haiyang Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Haiyang Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael B. Hay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael B. Hay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael B. Hay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael B. Hay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael B. Hay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael B. Hay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael B. Hay. The network helps show where Michael B. Hay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael B. Hay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael B. Hay Line = papers co-authored together Michael B. Hay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001723
2 2006307
3 2007227
4
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (Gem)-2002 Executive Report
2009151
5 2003144
6 2005111
7 2015110
8 200595
9 199481
10 199480
11 200366
12 200164
13 200257
14 200354
15 201250
16 200748
17 200646
18 200843
19 200742
20 200641

About Michael B. Hay

Michael B. Hay is a scholar working on Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organic Chemistry, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 54 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Private Equity and Venture Capital (11 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (11 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (10 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (4 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (4 papers) and Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (400 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (1.1k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (634 citations), Accounting (429 citations) and Organic Chemistry (798 citations). Michael B. Hay has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include John P. Wolfe, Erkko Autio, Satish C. B. Myneni, Magnus Klofsten, Robert H. Keeley, George G. C. Parker, Peter Kelly, William D. Bygrave, Ari Ginsberg and William Bygrave. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Process Research & Development, Venture Capital, Long Range Planning, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Water Resources Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact