Melissa Singer

1.0k citations
10 papers · 737 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Melissa Singer

10 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Melissa Singer
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 581
  • Human-Computer Interaction 210
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 324
  • Language and Linguistics 151
  • Social Psychology 171
Replace Miriam A. Novack with:
Miriam A. Novack United States
Manuela Macedonia Germany
Mingyuan Chu United Kingdom
Elena T. Levy United States
Kensy Cooperrider United States
Cynthia Butcher United States
Shuichi Nobe United States
Elizabeth M. Wakefield United States
Lynn K. Perry United States
Ronald R. Kelly United States
Melissa Singer relative to Miriam A. Novack United States Miriam A. Novack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Miriam A. Novack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melissa Singer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa Singer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa Singer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa Singer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa Singer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa Singer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa Singer. The network helps show where Melissa Singer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Melissa Singer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melissa Singer Line = papers co-authored together Melissa Singer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2005237
2 1999188
3 2003147
4 200867
5 200239
6 201629
7 199915
8
Students' sense-making with visual data in small-group argumentation
20089
9
The Function of Gesture in Mathematical and Scientific Discourse in the Classroom
20175
10 20241

About Melissa Singer

Melissa Singer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education and Speech and Hearing, having authored 10 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (7 papers), Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (6 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper), Education and Critical Thinking Development (1 paper), Science Education and Pedagogy (1 paper) and Education and Technology Integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (581 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (210 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (324 citations), Language and Linguistics (151 citations) and Social Psychology (171 citations). Melissa Singer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan Goldin‐Meadow, San Kim, Susan R. Goldman, Josh Radinsky, Spencer D. Kelly, Martha W. Alibali, R. Breckinridge Church, Michelle Perry and Susan Wagner Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Topics in Cognitive Science, Cognition and Instruction, Psychological Science and Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact