Mélanie Racine
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Manon ChoinièreDominique DionLorie A. KlodaYannick Tousignant‐LaflammeGilles DupuisMark P. JensenJordi MiróEster Solé
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (27 papers)Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (13 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Mélanie Racine
47 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Pharmacology 871
- Psychiatry and Mental health 551
- Physiology 451
- Clinical Psychology 421
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 345
Countries citing papers authored by Mélanie Racine
This map shows the geographic impact of Mélanie Racine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mélanie Racine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mélanie Racine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mélanie Racine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mélanie Racine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mélanie Racine. The network helps show where Mélanie Racine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mélanie Racine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mélanie Racine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mélanie Racine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mélanie Racine. Mélanie Racine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 228 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 143 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 334 | |
| 19 | A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception – Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men?breakdown → | 521 |
| 20 | 143 |
About Mélanie Racine
Mélanie Racine is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (27 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (13 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (871 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (236 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (551 citations). Mélanie Racine has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Manon Choinière, Dominique Dion, Lorie A. Kloda, Yannick Tousignant‐Laflamme, Gilles Dupuis, Mark P. Jensen, Jordi Miró, Ester Solé, Elena Castarlenas and Catarina Tomé‐Pires. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Pain and Medical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.