Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception – Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men?
2011521 citationsMélanie Racine, Yannick Tousignant‐Laflamme et al.Painprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilles Dupuis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilles Dupuis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilles Dupuis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilles Dupuis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilles Dupuis. The network helps show where Gilles Dupuis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gilles Dupuis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gilles Dupuis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gilles Dupuis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gilles Dupuis. Gilles Dupuis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Etienne, Anne‐Marie & Gilles Dupuis. (2012). Adaptation et bien-être. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).
9.
Dupuis, Gilles, et al.. (2012). La mesure du bonheur et de la qualité de vie au travail: un outil de prévention des risques psychosociaux au travail. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
10.
Racine, Mélanie, Yannick Tousignant‐Laflamme, Lorie A. Kloda, et al.. (2011). A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception – Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men?. Pain. 153(3). 602–618.521 indexed citations breakdown →
Dupuis, Gilles. (2011). Croire à crédit ou le credo laïque / Thérèse mon amour de Julia Kristeva. Fayard, 749 p. / Cet incroyable besoin de croire de Julia Kristeva. Bayard, 189 p.. Érudit (Université de Montréal). 52–53.
13.
Missotten, Pierre, et al.. (2010). The Impact of Children’s Illness Perceptions on Paediatric Cancer Patients’ Quality of Life. Psycho-Oncology. 19.5 indexed citations
14.
Missotten, Pierre, et al.. (2010). The influence of children’s and parents’ illness perceptions on paediatrics cancer patients’ quality of life. Psychology and Health. 25.2 indexed citations
Dupuis, Gilles. (2007). À démocratie totalitaire, remède autoritaire / La démocratie totalitaire. Penser la modernité postdémocratique, de Matthieu Baumier. Presses de la Renaissance, 287 p.. 14–15.
17.
Dupuis, Gilles. (2007). Perdre aux dames / Échecs et mâles. Les modèles masculins au Québec, du marquis de Montcalm à Jacques Parizeau, de Mathieu-Robert Sauvé. Les Intouchables, 316 p.. 26–27.2 indexed citations
18.
Dupuis, Gilles. (2006). Des lieux (non) communs. Braconnages identitaires. Un Québec palimpseste de Simon Harel. VLB Éditeur, « Le soi et l’autre », 129 p.. 41–42.2 indexed citations
19.
Dupuis, Gilles, et al.. (2000). Measurement of quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.