Philip Peng

12.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
151 papers, 6.7k citations indexed

About

Philip Peng is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Peng has authored 151 papers receiving a total of 6.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 112 papers in Surgery, 37 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 31 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Philip Peng's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (71 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (44 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (30 papers). Philip Peng is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (71 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (44 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (30 papers). Philip Peng collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Philip Peng's co-authors include Chin-wern Chan, Frances Chung, Jean Wong, Amir Abrishami, Alan N. Sandler, Anne Agur, Vincent Chan, John Tran, Ki Jinn Chin and Anahi Perlas and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Scientific Reports and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Philip Peng

143 papers receiving 6.5k citations

Hit Papers

Predictors of Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 2018 250 500 750

Peers

Philip Peng
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Surgery 4.3k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1.6k
  • Pharmacology 1.4k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.3k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 742
Replace James P. Rathmell with:
James P. Rathmell United States
Asokumar Buvanendran United States
Timothy T. Houle United States
José De Andrés Spain
Samer Narouze United States
Winfried Meißner Germany
Marco A. E. Marcus Netherlands
Richard Brull Canada
Jørgen B. Dahl Denmark
Maarten van Kleef Netherlands
James P. Rathmell United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip Peng
Philip Peng · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip Peng
Philip Peng · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Peng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Peng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Peng. The network helps show where Philip Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Peng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Peng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Peng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Peng. Philip Peng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 24
2 4
3 4
4 3
5 101
6 7
7 6
8 4
9 11
10 5
11 80
12
Predictors of Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption breakdown →
784
13 5
14 75
15 242
16 25
17 16
18 47
19 2
20 314

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026