Mel Woods

25 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Mel Woods
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Ecological Modeling 46
  • Human-Computer Interaction 49
  • Information Systems and Management 48
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 37
  • Computer Science Applications 21
Replace Sascha Dickel with:
Sascha Dickel Germany
Helen Pritchard United Kingdom
Yanni Alexander Loukissas United States
Geof Bowker France
Bronwyn Cumbo Australia
Enric Senabre Hidalgo Spain
Drew Hemment United Kingdom
Artemis Skarlatidou United Kingdom
Scout Calvert United States
Mara Balestrini United Kingdom
Mel Woods relative to Sascha Dickel Germany Sascha Dickel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Sascha Dickel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mel Woods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mel Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mel Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mel Woods more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mel Woods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mel Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mel Woods. The network helps show where Mel Woods may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mel Woods, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mel Woods Line = papers co-authored together Mel Woods links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201493
2 202031
3 202122
4 201820
5 201817
6 201916
7 201516
8 201812
9 198710
10 202110
11 20207
12 20207
13 20227
14 20127
15 20243
16
Modernizing Environmental Justice: Regulation and the Role of an Environmental Tribunal
20033
17 20133
18 20123
19 20192
20 20142

About Mel Woods

Mel Woods is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Ecological Modeling, Information Systems and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Computer Science Applications, having authored 25 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (4 papers), Precipitation Measurement and Analysis (3 papers), Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing (3 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (3 papers), Smart Agriculture and AI (3 papers) and Personal Information Management and User Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (46 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (49 citations), Information Systems and Management (48 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (37 citations) and Computer Science Applications (21 citations). Mel Woods has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Maxwell, Stephann Makri, Sarah Sharples, Ann Blandford, Drew Hemment, Raquel Ajates, Gerid Hager, Mara Balestrini, Angelika Xaver and Luca Zappa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, British Journal of Industrial Relations, European Journal of Remote Sensing, Sensors and Frontiers in Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact