Drew Hemment

35 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Drew Hemment
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ecological Modeling 39
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Human-Computer Interaction 26
  • Geography, Planning and Development 18
  • Museology 11
Replace Max Ritts with:
Max Ritts Canada
Andrea K. Thomer United States
Helen Pritchard United Kingdom
Kirk Jalbert United States
Jens Ingensand Switzerland
Sanlyn Buxner United States
Yingwei Yan Singapore
Mel Woods United Kingdom
Dan Podjed Slovenia
Geof Bowker France
Drew Hemment relative to Max Ritts Canada Max Ritts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Max Ritts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Drew Hemment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Drew Hemment's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drew Hemment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drew Hemment more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Drew Hemment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Drew Hemment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Drew Hemment. The network helps show where Drew Hemment may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Drew Hemment, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Drew Hemment Line = papers co-authored together Drew Hemment links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 202031
3 200629
4 202319
5 202016
6 201916
7 201012
8 201112
9
e is for Ekstasis.
19979
10 20058
11 20197
12 20207
13 20207
14 20195
15
Loca: Set To Discoverable.
20065
16 20243
17
WeObserve: An Ecosystem of Citizen Observatories for Environmental Monitoring
20183
18
Emoto: visualising the online response to London 2012
20133
19 20202
20 20242

About Drew Hemment

Drew Hemment is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Safety Research, Museology and Geology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers), Precipitation Measurement and Analysis (4 papers), Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (3 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (3 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (39 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (26 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (18 citations) and Museology (11 citations). Drew Hemment has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Isadora Christel, Moritz Stefaner, Carlo Buontempo, Mel Woods, Dragana Bojović, Fernando Cucchietti, Raquel Ajates, Angelika Xaver, Gerid Hager and Luca Zappa. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Climate Services, Sustainability and Hungarian Geographical Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026