This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Smyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Smyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Smyth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Smyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Smyth. The network helps show where Michael Smyth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Smyth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Smyth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Smyth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Smyth. Michael Smyth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brynskov, Martin, et al.. (2015). Designing digital urban interactions industry landscape and market analysis.. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University).1 indexed citations
6.
Smyth, Michael, et al.. (2013). From Urban Space to Future Place. Lirias (KU Leuven).
7.
Smyth, Michael. (2011). A White Side of Black Britain: Interracial Intimacy and Racial Literacy. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).37 indexed citations
8.
Rodgers, Paul & Michael Smyth. (2010). Digital Blur :: Creative Practice at the Boundaries of Architecture, Design and Art. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).15 indexed citations
Kettley, Sarah, et al.. (2007). ENSEMBLE: EMBODIED EXPERIENCES IN A SOUND AND JEWELLERY INSTALLATION. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository).
12.
McCall, Roderick, et al.. (2005). Responsive Environments, Place and Presence. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 3(1). 35–73.12 indexed citations
13.
McCall, Roderick, et al.. (2004). Probing the sense of place.. Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University).3 indexed citations
14.
Smyth, Michael, et al.. (2004). Who am I and where am I? - switching and stitching in the digital age.. Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University). 1487–1492.2 indexed citations
Smyth, Michael. (2002). Haunting space - the role of the body in design interaction.. Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University). 923–928.1 indexed citations
17.
Benyon, David, Manfred Fahle, Erik Granum, et al.. (2002). An Investigation into Virtual Representation of Real Places.4 indexed citations
18.
Smyth, Michael. (1998). The tools designers use: what do they reveal about design thinking?. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University). 48(1). 100–2.3 indexed citations
19.
Scrivener, Stephen, et al.. (1991). The use of design activity for research into Computer Supported Co-operative Working (CSCW). Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).3 indexed citations
20.
Smyth, Michael & Anthony Clarke. (1990). Human-human co-operation and the design of co-operative machines.. Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.