Meghan O’Connell

36 papers receiving 961 citations

Peers

Meghan O’Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 562
  • Pharmacy 90
  • General Health Professions 372
  • Speech and Hearing 94
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
Replace Apolinaras Zaborskis with:
Apolinaras Zaborskis Lithuania
Lesley Cottrell United States
Parisa Amiri Iran
Giacomo Lazzeri Italy
Patricia T. Alpert United States
Monica Hunsberger Sweden
Miranda Pallan United Kingdom
Kate Bartlem Australia
Jennifer Hawes-Dawson United States
Lucia Magee United Kingdom
Meghan O’Connell relative to Apolinaras Zaborskis Lithuania Apolinaras Zaborskis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Apolinaras Zaborskis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meghan O’Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meghan O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meghan O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meghan O’Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meghan O’Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meghan O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meghan O’Connell. The network helps show where Meghan O’Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meghan O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meghan O’Connell Line = papers co-authored together Meghan O’Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005382
2 201597
3 201274
4 201164
5 201263
6 202144
7 201844
8 201533
9 201430
10 201726
11 200424
12 202021
13 200417
14 202015
15 201514
16 201314
17 202010
18 20208
19 20227
20 20037

About Meghan O’Connell

Meghan O’Connell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (14 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (11 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (6 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers) and Youth Substance Use and School Attendance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (562 citations), Pharmacy (90 citations), General Health Professions (372 citations), Speech and Hearing (94 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations). Meghan O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn E. Henderson, Marlene B. Schwartz, David L. Katz, Ming‐Chin Yeh, Laurie Anderson, William H. Dietz, Valentine Njike, Haq Nawaz, Stella Cory and Dedra Buchwald. Their work appears in journals such as Childhood Obesity, Behavioral Sleep Medicine, Research in Nursing & Health, The Journal of School Nursing and American Journal of Health Promotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact