Behavioral Sleep Medicine

784 papers and 20.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 784 papers published in Behavioral Sleep Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 20.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Behavioral Sleep Medicine usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (696 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (350 papers) and Education (132 papers) specifically the topics of Sleep and related disorders (681 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (344 papers) and Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (164 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Behavioral Sleep Medicine are Kenneth L. Lichstein, Daniel J. Buysse, Daniel J. Taylor, Anne Germain, Jodi A. Mindell, H. Heith Durrence, Joel E. Dimsdale, Sonia Ancoli‐Israel, Lisa J. Meltzer and Charles M. Morin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Behavioral Sleep Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behavioral Sleep Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behavioral Sleep Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behavioral Sleep Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioral Sleep Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025