Megan Smith

1.5k citations
76 papers · 930 indexed · h-index 17

Megan Smith

70 papers receiving 896 citations

Peers

Megan Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Family Practice 114
  • Occupational Therapy 123
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 23
  • Research and Theory 14
  • General Health Professions 270
Replace Ian Edwards with:
Ian Edwards Australia
Laurita M. Hack United States
Janet L. Welch United States
Samuel Edelbring Sweden
Rajesh S. Mangrulkar United States
John Q. Young United States
Marit Graue Norway
Isabelle Bragard Belgium
Katharina V. Echt United States
Kirsten Jack United Kingdom
Megan Smith relative to Ian Edwards Australia Ian Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ian Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Smith. The network helps show where Megan Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan Smith Line = papers co-authored together Megan Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20230
4 20231
5 20214
6
Libraries and Mental Health Initiatives: A literature review
20211
7 20208
8 20195
9 20191
10 201826
11 201650
12 20165
13 20155
14 201410
15
Clinical Reasoning Capability: Current Understanding and Implications for Physiotherapy Educators
20106
16 201034
17 200852
18
Factors influencing clinical decision making
200852
19 200529
20 200081

About Megan Smith

Megan Smith is a scholar working on Family Practice, Research and Theory, Occupational Therapy, Health Information Management and General Health Professions, having authored 76 papers that have together received 930 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (8 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (5 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (114 citations), Occupational Therapy (123 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (23 citations), Research and Theory (14 citations) and General Health Professions (270 citations). Megan Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joy Higgs, Franziska Trede, Elizabeth Ellis, Bill VanPatten, Rola Ajjawi, Margo Brewer, Helen Flavell, R. J. Wells, Christopher D. Ward and Linda Dawson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Housing Policy Debate, Physical Therapy Reviews and Physiotherapy Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026