Housing Policy Debate

1.2k papers and 29.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Housing Policy Debate in the last decades have received a total of 29.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Housing Policy Debate usually cover Sociology and Political Science (748 papers), Economics and Econometrics (712 papers) and Finance (615 papers) specifically the topics of Housing Market and Economics (673 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (671 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (592 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Housing Policy Debate are George Galster, Xavier de Souza Briggs, James E. Rosenbaum, John F. Kain, Margery Austin Turner, Ingrid Gould Ellen, Anthony J. Downs, Reid Ewing, William M. Rohe and James DeFilippis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Housing Policy Debate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Housing Policy Debate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Housing Policy Debate.

Countries where authors publish in Housing Policy Debate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Housing Policy Debate. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Housing Policy Debate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Housing Policy Debate more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025