Housing Policy Debate

1.3k papers and 33.2k indexed citations

About

The 1.3k papers published in Housing Policy Debate in the last decades have received a total of 33.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Housing Policy Debate usually cover Sociology and Political Science (762 papers), Economics and Econometrics (725 papers) and Finance (627 papers) specifically the topics of Housing Market and Economics (684 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (683 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (605 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Housing Policy Debate are George Galster, Xavier de Souza Briggs, James E. Rosenbaum, John F. Kain, Margery Austin Turner, Ingrid Gould Ellen, Anthony J. Downs, Michael E. Stone, James DeFilippis and William M. Rohe.

In The Last Decade

Housing Policy Debate

1.2k papers receiving 28.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Housing Policy Debate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Housing Policy Debate. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Housing Policy Debate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Housing Policy Debate more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Housing Policy Debate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Housing Policy Debate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Housing Policy Debate.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026