Physical Therapy Reviews

943 papers and 9.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 943 papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews usually cover Pharmacology (244 papers), Surgery (182 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (161 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (242 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (108 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physical Therapy Reviews are G. Lorimer Moseley, Nadine E. Foster, Joshua A. Cleland, Max Zusman, David J. Magee, Tim Watson, Jonathan M. Williams, Sharon Warren, Jenny Alexanders and Susan Armijo‐Olivo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Physical Therapy Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physical Therapy Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physical Therapy Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025