Megan Rees

2.0k citations
33 papers · 763 indexed · h-index 11

Megan Rees

28 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers

Megan Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 273
  • Nephrology 133
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 341
  • Internal Medicine 21
  • Health 47
Replace Ethel‐Sherry Gordon with:
Ethel‐Sherry Gordon Israel
J. Dudenhausen Germany
Chong-Woo Bae South Korea
Joël Noutakdie Tochie Cameroon
A Coomarasamy United Kingdom
Sammy Zakaria United States
Harish Pemde India
Nancy T. Field United States
Ruth Rennicks White Canada
Visalakshi Jeyaseelan India
Megan Rees relative to Ethel‐Sherry Gordon Israel Ethel‐Sherry Gordon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ethel‐Sherry Gordon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Rees. The network helps show where Megan Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan Rees Line = papers co-authored together Megan Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20243
2 202311
3 20232
4
COVID-19 infection and the broader impacts of the pandemic on healthcare workers
202261
5 20220
6 20226
7 20220
8 20221
9 20210
10 20200
11 20197
12 20191
13 20156
14 201410
15 200037
16 199914
17 1999259
18
The diagnostic power of the stages of critical discussion in the analysis and evaluation of problem-solving discussions
19992
19 1998174
20
Low birth weight and albuminuria in an Australian Aboriginal community with high rates of renal disease and renal failure.
19978

About Megan Rees

Megan Rees is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (3 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers) and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (273 citations), Nephrology (133 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (341 citations). Megan Rees has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wendy E. Hoy, John D. Mathews, Zhiqiang Wang, Michelle Giles, Stephen Cole, David J. Pugsley, David A. McCredie, Natasha Smallwood, Warren Harrex and Catherine Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Kidney International, Journal of Pragmatics, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinical Anatomy and The Prostate.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026