Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

69.8k citations
5.3k papers · indexed · active since 1950

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

5.0k papers receiving 65.5k citations

Peers

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 29.6k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 25.8k
  • Reproductive Medicine 10.5k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 20.6k
  • Rheumatology 6.6k
Replace Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology with:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology United Kingdom
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology United States
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research Japan
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation United States
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology United States
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada Canada
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Germany
Journal of Women s Health United States
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey United States
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine United States
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology relative to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology United Kingdom Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

About Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

The 5.3k papers published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the last decades have received a total of 69.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.2k papers), Reproductive Medicine (823 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (740 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (609 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (599 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (437 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (395 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (378 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (371 papers) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (369 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology are Hans Peter Dietz, Norman A. Beischer, J. B. Brown, Jane E. Harding, Caroline A Crowther, Jan E. Dickinson, Lesley McCowan, Sandra Löwe, Hendrina A. de Boo and Suzanne M. Garland.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026