Michael Lim

1.7k total citations
34 papers, 737 citations indexed

About

Michael Lim is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Rheumatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Lim has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 737 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Surgery, 10 papers in Oncology and 9 papers in Rheumatology. Recurrent topics in Michael Lim's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (9 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (9 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (8 papers). Michael Lim is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (9 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (9 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (8 papers). Michael Lim collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Michael Lim's co-authors include P. M. Sagar, Dermot Burke, P J Finan, Jamil Ahmed, Dinesh Thekkinkattil, J MacFie, S. Khan, T. V. Chandrasekaran, Stevan Stojkovic and So Young Sohn and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, European Journal of Operational Research and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

Michael Lim

32 papers receiving 700 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Lim United Kingdom 16 532 223 182 174 97 34 737
Zuri Murrell United States 17 572 1.1× 237 1.1× 101 0.6× 42 0.2× 170 1.8× 41 868
Sandy H. Fang United States 17 381 0.7× 420 1.9× 83 0.5× 50 0.3× 103 1.1× 56 788
James M. O’Riordan Ireland 18 893 1.7× 327 1.5× 68 0.4× 87 0.5× 109 1.1× 50 1.2k
Ann Brannigan Ireland 13 364 0.7× 241 1.1× 80 0.4× 76 0.4× 144 1.5× 21 678
Salih Aksu Türkiye 16 183 0.3× 144 0.6× 77 0.4× 56 0.3× 66 0.7× 94 960
John M. MacKeigan United States 15 697 1.3× 467 2.1× 49 0.3× 195 1.1× 113 1.2× 24 982
Anthony A. Eyers Australia 19 719 1.4× 365 1.6× 35 0.2× 422 2.4× 49 0.5× 33 1.1k
Karen Flashman United Kingdom 16 396 0.7× 554 2.5× 81 0.4× 54 0.3× 69 0.7× 39 712
Peadar S. Waters Australia 14 499 0.9× 340 1.5× 60 0.3× 26 0.1× 18 0.2× 79 745
H. Ramesh India 16 609 1.1× 426 1.9× 33 0.2× 25 0.1× 23 0.2× 67 874

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lim. The network helps show where Michael Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Lim. Michael Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jayaram, Lata, Paul T. King, John E. Hunt, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of high dose N- Acetylcysteine on airway inflammation and quality of life outcomes in adults with bronchiectasis: A randomised placebo-controlled pilot study. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 84. 102283–102283. 11 indexed citations
3.
Alkhawam, Hassan, et al.. (2019). CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN WOMEN WITH MULTI VESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 73(9). 42–42. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lim, Michael, et al.. (2017). Role of clinical pathway in improving the quality of care for patients with faecal incontinence: A randomised trial. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 8(1). 81–81. 1 indexed citations
5.
Lim, Michael. (2015). Antegrade Techniques for Chronic Total Occlusions. Current Cardiology Reviews. 11(4). 285–290. 4 indexed citations
6.
Lim, Michael, et al.. (2014). The Test-Retest Reliability of Fecal Incontinence Severity and Quality-of-Life Assessment Tools. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 57(5). 638–644. 15 indexed citations
7.
Lim, Michael, et al.. (2013). Ten‐year review of gastrointestinal stromal tumours at a tertiary referral hospital in New Zealand. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 86(3). 162–166. 2 indexed citations
8.
Lim, Michael, et al.. (2012). The use of Permacol® injections for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Updates in Surgery. 64(4). 289–295. 6 indexed citations
9.
Hall, Thomas C., et al.. (2011). Saphenofemoral Junction Ligation and Disconnection for Varicose Veins—A Longitudinal Study of Cosmesis and Function. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 25(5). 662–668. 2 indexed citations
10.
Ahmed, Jamil, S. Khan, Michael Lim, T. V. Chandrasekaran, & J MacFie. (2011). Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols – compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Disease. 14(9). 1045–1051. 142 indexed citations
11.
Lim, Michael, et al.. (2011). Systematic review of perianal implants in the treatment of faecal incontinence. British journal of surgery. 98(11). 1526–1536. 27 indexed citations
12.
Khan, Shakeeb, Jamil Ahmed, Michael Lim, et al.. (2010). Colonoscopy in the octogenarian population: Diagnostic and survival outcomes from a large series of patients. The Surgeon. 9(4). 195–199. 5 indexed citations
13.
Ahmed, Jamil, et al.. (2010). Predictors of length of stay in patients having elective colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery protocol. International Journal of Surgery. 8(8). 628–632. 55 indexed citations
14.
Lim, Michael, John Adams, Mark H. Wilcox, et al.. (2009). An Assessment of Bacterial Dysbiosis in Pouchitis Using Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms of 16S Ribosomal DNA From Pouch Effluent Microbiota. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 52(8). 1492–1500. 22 indexed citations
15.
Lim, Michael, et al.. (2007). The Impact of Preoperative Immunomodulation on Pouch-Related Septic Complications After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 50(7). 943–951. 56 indexed citations
16.
Thekkinkattil, Dinesh, Michael Lim, P J Finan, P. M. Sagar, & Dermot Burke. (2007). Awareness of investigations and treatment of faecal incontinence among the general practitioners: a postal questionnaire survey. Colorectal Disease. 10(3). 263–267. 24 indexed citations
17.
Lim, Michael, et al.. (2007). Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Females: Functional Outcome of Mesh Sacrocolpopexy and Rectopexy as a Combined Procedure. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 50(9). 1412–1421. 38 indexed citations
18.
Lim, Michael, et al.. (2007). The Assessment of a Rapid Noninvasive Immunochromatographic Assay Test for Fecal Lactoferrin in Patients with Suspected Inflammation of the Ileal Pouch. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 51(1). 96–99. 17 indexed citations
19.
Lim, Michael, Colm OBoyle, C M S Royston, & Peter Sedman. (2006). Day case laparoscopic herniorraphy. Surgical Endoscopy. 20(9). 1453–1459. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026