Matthew W. Lewis

27 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Matthew W. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Strategy and Management 167
  • Mechanics of Materials 125
  • Management Science and Operations Research 103
  • Materials Chemistry 92
  • Mechanical Engineering 73
Replace Tina Barnes with:
Tina Barnes United Kingdom
Choi Choi South Korea
Robert Hunt Australia
Byung-Jin Park South Korea
Pertti Aaltonen Finland
Slavko Dolinšek Slovenia
B.C. Choi South Korea
Hyun-Jong Lee South Korea
S. Jayachandran India
Matthew W. Lewis relative to Tina Barnes United Kingdom Tina Barnes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tina Barnes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew W. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew W. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew W. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew W. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew W. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew W. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew W. Lewis. The network helps show where Matthew W. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew W. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew W. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew W. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew W. Lewis. Matthew W. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2
Teach for America Gets Mostly High Marks from Principal Survey
1
3 0
4 0
5 11
6
New Equipping Strategies for Combat Support Hospitals.
2
7
Making Improvements to The Army Distributed Learning Program
0
8
Modeling the mechanical response of PBX 9501
9
9 6
10
Commonality in Military Equipment: A Framework to Improve Acquisition Decisions
2
11 36
12 1
13 22
14 1
15 1
16 56
17 10
18 1
19
Microworld Simulations for Command and Control Training of Theater Logistics and Support Staffs: A Curriculum Strategy
2
20 1

About Matthew W. Lewis

Matthew W. Lewis is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Software and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 35 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Composite Material Mechanics (4 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (4 papers) and Polymer Foaming and Composites (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (167 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (103 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (48 citations). Matthew W. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bulgaria and Canada. Frequent co-authors include S. G. Green, Gordon E. Dehler, M. Ann Welsh, F. L. Addessio, Q. H. Zuo, J. K. Dienes, K. K. Chawla, Gary M. Gladysz, M. Koopman and B. Benedikt. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Academy of Management Journal and Acta Materialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026