Matthew S. McCoy

1.6k total citations
51 papers, 906 citations indexed

About

Matthew S. McCoy is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew S. McCoy has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 906 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 15 papers in General Health Professions and 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Matthew S. McCoy's work include Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (11 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (8 papers). Matthew S. McCoy is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (11 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (8 papers). Matthew S. McCoy collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Matthew S. McCoy's co-authors include Ezekiel Emanuel, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Lisa Herzog, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, John W. Urwin, Harald Schmidt, Govind Persad, Christopher Heath Wellman, G. Owen Schaefer and Kok‐Chor Tan and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet.

In The Last Decade

Matthew S. McCoy

47 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew S. McCoy United States 17 213 209 206 159 144 51 906
Trudo Lemmens Canada 15 228 1.1× 148 0.7× 198 1.0× 411 2.6× 95 0.7× 96 925
Stephanie R. Morain United States 17 306 1.4× 148 0.7× 103 0.5× 331 2.1× 83 0.6× 77 897
Zhiruo Zhang China 17 254 1.2× 71 0.3× 99 0.5× 100 0.6× 109 0.8× 52 799
Michael S. Sinha United States 13 88 0.4× 37 0.2× 179 0.9× 84 0.5× 73 0.5× 46 693
Emily Hallgren United States 12 179 0.8× 228 1.1× 76 0.4× 202 1.3× 79 0.5× 29 731
Ashoo Grover India 15 167 0.8× 249 1.2× 106 0.5× 90 0.6× 158 1.1× 71 873
Jessica T. DeFrank United States 15 174 0.8× 81 0.4× 106 0.5× 119 0.7× 20 0.1× 26 992
Dustin G. Gibson United States 21 496 2.3× 287 1.4× 36 0.2× 114 0.7× 92 0.6× 64 1.4k
Tessa Copp Australia 16 351 1.6× 258 1.2× 86 0.4× 301 1.9× 68 0.5× 55 1.1k
Chang Sun China 6 144 0.7× 89 0.4× 212 1.0× 90 0.6× 665 4.6× 17 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew S. McCoy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew S. McCoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew S. McCoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew S. McCoy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew S. McCoy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew S. McCoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew S. McCoy. The network helps show where Matthew S. McCoy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew S. McCoy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew S. McCoy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew S. McCoy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew S. McCoy. Matthew S. McCoy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barnhill, Anne, et al.. (2025). ‘Why Do You Ask?’ Revisiting the Purpose of Eliciting the Public’s Moral Judgments About Emerging Technologies. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 16(3). 127–139.
2.
Lynch, Holly Fernandez, et al.. (2025). A review of public comments submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in response to the 2022 National Coverage Decision on treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 12(1). lsaf004–lsaf004. 1 indexed citations
3.
McCoy, Matthew S., et al.. (2025). What justifies public engagement in health financing decisions?. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 103(1). 32–36. 2 indexed citations
4.
Emanuel, Ezekiel J., et al.. (2024). Fair Allocation of GLP-1 and Dual GLP-1–GIP Receptor Agonists. New England Journal of Medicine. 390(20). 1839–1842. 18 indexed citations
6.
McCoy, Matthew S., et al.. (2024). Managing institutional conflicts: Stakeholder accounts of communication between conflict of interest and technology transfer offices. PLoS ONE. 19(8). e0304519–e0304519. 1 indexed citations
8.
Gupta, R., Ari B. Friedman, & Matthew S. McCoy. (2022). Prevalence of Third-party Tracking on Medical Journal Websites. JAMA Health Forum. 3(3). e220167–e220167. 3 indexed citations
9.
Glickman, Joel D., et al.. (2022). Ensuring Equitable Access to Dialysis: The Medicare Secondary Payer Act in Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita, Inc.. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 33(10). 1814–1816. 6 indexed citations
10.
Emanuel, Ezekiel, Allen Buchanan, Cécile Fabre, et al.. (2021). On the Ethics of Vaccine Nationalism: The Case for the Fair Priority for Residents Framework. Ethics & International Affairs. 35(4). 543–562. 13 indexed citations
11.
Lynch, Holly Fernandez, Steven Joffe, & Matthew S. McCoy. (2021). The limits of acceptable political influence over the FDA. Nature Medicine. 27(2). 188–190. 11 indexed citations
12.
Herzog, Lisa, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Ezekiel Emanuel, & Matthew S. McCoy. (2021). Covax must go beyond proportional allocation of covid vaccines to ensure fair and equitable access. BMJ. 372. m4853–m4853. 54 indexed citations
13.
Emanuel, Ezekiel, Govind Persad, Adam L. Kern, et al.. (2020). An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation. Science. 369(6509). 1309–1312. 212 indexed citations
14.
Wayant, Cole, Lisa Cosgrove, Elie A. Akl, et al.. (2020). Ten years later: a review of the US 2009 institute of medicine report on conflicts of interest and solutions for further reform. BMJ evidence-based medicine. 27(1). 46–54. 20 indexed citations
15.
McCoy, Matthew S., et al.. (2019). Patient and public involvement: Two sides of the same coin or different coins altogether?. Bioethics. 33(6). 708–715. 32 indexed citations
16.
McCoy, Matthew S., Karin Jongsma, Phoebe Friesen, et al.. (2018). National Standards for Public Involvement in Research: missing the forest for the trees. Journal of Medical Ethics. 44(12). 801–804. 26 indexed citations
17.
McCoy, Matthew S. & Ezekiel Emanuel. (2016). Addressing conflicts of interest of public speakers at advisory committee meetings. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 13(5). 267–268. 5 indexed citations
18.
McCoy, Matthew S.. (2011). Evaluation of a Standardized Wellness Protocol to Improve Anthropometric and Physiologic Function and to Reduce Health Risk Factors: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcome. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 17(1). 39–44. 3 indexed citations
19.
McCoy, Matthew S.. (2008). Autonomy, Consent, and Medical Paternalism: Legal Issues in Medical Intervention. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 14(6). 785–792. 13 indexed citations
20.
Gelleny, Ronald D. & Matthew S. McCoy. (2001). Globalization and Government Policy Independence: The Issue of Taxation. Political Research Quarterly. 54(3). 509–529. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026