Tessa Copp

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
55 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Tessa Copp is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Tessa Copp has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in General Health Professions, 18 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 17 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Tessa Copp's work include Ovarian function and disorders (15 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers). Tessa Copp is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (15 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers). Tessa Copp collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Tessa Copp's co-authors include Kirsten McCaffery, Brooke Nickel, Erin Cvejic, Rachael H Dodd, Julie Ayre, Carissa Bonner, Kristen Pickles, Jennifer Isautier, Samuel Cornell and Thomas Dakin and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

Tessa Copp

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Social Media Posts About Medical Tests With Potential for Overdiagnosis

2025 12 citations Brooke Nickel, Ray Moynihan et al. JAMA Network Open profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tessa Copp Australia	16	351	301	258	237	203	55	1.1k
Danielle Marie Muscat Australia	22	850 2.4×	219 0.7×	170 0.7×	129 0.5×	97 0.5×	90	1.3k
Karen Patricia Williams United States	21	521 1.5×	237 0.8×	250 1.0×	261 1.1×	220 1.1×	67	1.5k
Suzanne McMurphy Canada	10	471 1.3×	242 0.8×	199 0.8×	219 0.9×	151 0.7×	18	1.1k
Teresa Gavaruzzi Italy	15	343 1.0×	207 0.7×	397 1.5×	207 0.9×	87 0.4×	38	1.1k
Mary Putt United States	7	358 1.0×	199 0.7×	191 0.7×	222 0.9×	148 0.7×	8	964
Lydia A. Isaac United States	6	380 1.1×	181 0.6×	196 0.8×	234 1.0×	132 0.7×	6	918
Hayley S. Thompson United States	19	398 1.1×	233 0.8×	231 0.9×	282 1.2×	112 0.6×	45	1.2k
Purva Abhyankar United Kingdom	14	572 1.6×	362 1.2×	109 0.4×	107 0.5×	132 0.7×	31	1.2k
Emily Hallgren United States	12	179 0.5×	202 0.7×	228 0.9×	124 0.5×	60 0.3×	29	731
Elizabeth Dormandy United Kingdom	21	509 1.5×	408 1.4×	81 0.3×	101 0.4×	77 0.4×	34	1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Tessa Copp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tessa Copp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tessa Copp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tessa Copp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tessa Copp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tessa Copp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tessa Copp. The network helps show where Tessa Copp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tessa Copp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tessa Copp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tessa Copp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tessa Copp. Tessa Copp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Wilson, Louise F., Tessa Copp, Martha Hickey, et al.. (2025). Women who experience heavy menstrual bleeding: prevalence and characteristics from young adulthood to midlife, Australia, 2000–2021: a longitudinal cohort survey study. The Medical Journal of Australia. 222(4). 191–197. 2 indexed citations

Nickel, Brooke, Tessa Copp, Jolyn Hersch, et al.. (2025). Social Media Marketing of Non-Evidence-Based Women's Health Interventions: Protocol for a Content Analysis Using Participatory Research Methods. JMIR Research Protocols. 14. e76750–e76750.

Copp, Tessa, Rachel Thompson, Karin Hammarberg, et al.. (2024). Attitudes, knowledge and practice regarding the anti‐müllerian hormone test among general practitioners and reproductive specialists: A cross‐sectional study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 131(8). 1072–1079.

Nickel, Brooke, Raffael Heiss, Patti Shih, et al.. (2024). Social Media Promotion of Health Tests With Potential for Overdiagnosis or Overuse: Protocol for a Content Analysis. JMIR Research Protocols. 13. e56899–e56899. 3 indexed citations

Zadro, Joshua R, Kristen Pickles, Tessa Copp, et al.. (2024). RECITAL: a non-inferiority randomised control trial evaluating a virtual fracture clinic compared with in-person care for people with simple fractures (study protocol). BMJ Open. 14(2). e080800–e080800.

Bonner, Carissa, Carys Batcup, Erin Cvejic, et al.. (2023). Addressing Behavioral Barriers to COVID-19 Testing With Health Literacy–Sensitive eHealth Interventions: Results From 2 National Surveys and 2 Randomized Experiments. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 9. e40441–e40441. 7 indexed citations

Copp, Tessa, Rachel Thompson, Jenny Doust, et al.. (2023). Community awareness and use of anti-Müllerian hormone testing in Australia: a population survey of women. Human Reproduction. 38(8). 1571–1577. 11 indexed citations

Thompson, Rachel, et al.. (2023). Websites Selling Direct-to-Consumer Anti-Mullerian Hormone Tests. JAMA Network Open. 6(8). e2330192–e2330192. 15 indexed citations

Moss, Katrina M., Jenny Doust, Tessa Copp, Hayden Homer, & Gita D. Mishra. (2023). Fertility treatment pathways and births for women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome—a retrospective population linked data study. Fertility and Sterility. 121(2). 314–322. 7 indexed citations

10.

Lee, Iris, et al.. (2022). Implementation of international guidelines for polycystic ovary syndrome: barriers and facilitators among gynecologists and primary care providers. F&S Reports. 3(2). 94–101. 11 indexed citations

11.

Nickel, Brooke, Kristen Pickles, Erin Cvejic, et al.. (2022). Predictors of confidence and trust in government and institutions during the COVID-19 response in Australia. The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific. 23. 100490–100490. 13 indexed citations

12.

Nickel, Brooke, et al.. (2021). The Impact of Breast Density Information or Notification on Women’s Cognitive, Psychological, and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 113(10). 1299–1328. 24 indexed citations

13.

Cornell, Samuel, Brooke Nickel, Erin Cvejic, et al.. (2021). Positive outcomes associated with the COVID‐19 pandemic in Australia. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 33(2). 311–319. 36 indexed citations

14.

Bonner, Carissa, Erin Cvejic, Julie Ayre, et al.. (2021). The Psychological Impact of Hypertension During COVID-19 Restrictions: Retrospective Case-Control Study. JMIRx Med. 2(1). e25610–e25610. 10 indexed citations

15.

Copp, Tessa, Brooke Nickel, Sarah Lensen, et al.. (2021). Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) test information on Australian and New Zealand fertility clinic websites: a content analysis. BMJ Open. 11(7). e046927–e046927. 12 indexed citations

16.

Nickel, Brooke, et al.. (2021). Breast Density Notification: A Systematic Review of the Impact on Primary Care Practitioners. Journal of Women s Health. 30(10). 1457–1468. 9 indexed citations

17.

Smith, Jenna, Julie Ayre, Jesse Jansen, et al.. (2021). Impact of diagnostic labels and causal explanations for weight gain on diet intentions, cognitions and emotions: An experimental online study. Appetite. 167. 105612–105612. 2 indexed citations

18.

Pickles, Kristen, Erin Cvejic, Brooke Nickel, et al.. (2020). COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(1). e23805–e23805. 125 indexed citations

19.

Sharma, Sweekriti, Adrian C. Traeger, Mary O’Keeffe, et al.. (2020). Effect of information format on intentions and beliefs regarding diagnostic imaging for non-specific low back pain: A randomised controlled trial in members of the public. Patient Education and Counseling. 104(3). 595–602. 16 indexed citations

20.

Isautier, Jennifer, Tessa Copp, Julie Ayre, et al.. (2020). People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(12). e24531–e24531. 157 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact