Daniel Halliday
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- Health top 5%
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 3
-
- Legal principles and applications 3
- Property Rights and Legal Doctrine 2
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 3
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 2
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 2
-
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 2
- Co-authors
- Kok‐Chor TanMatthew S. McCoyCécile FabreAllen BuchananOle Frithjof NorheimR. J. LelandG. Owen SchaeferEzekiel Emanuel
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Halliday
22 papers receiving 366 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Modeling and Simulation 91
- Health 131
- Infectious Diseases 108
- Emergency Medical Services 27
- General Decision Sciences 6
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Halliday
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Halliday more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Halliday
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Halliday. The network helps show where Daniel Halliday may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Halliday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 9 | The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation | 2020 | 24 |
| 10 | 2020 | 212 | |
| 11 | The Ethics of Capitalism: An Introduction | 2020 | 0 |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 3 |
About Daniel Halliday
Daniel Halliday is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Law, Health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 papers) and Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (91 citations), Health (131 citations), Infectious Diseases (108 citations), Emergency Medical Services (27 citations) and General Decision Sciences (6 citations). Daniel Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kok‐Chor Tan, Matthew S. McCoy, Cécile Fabre, Allen Buchanan, Ole Frithjof Norheim, R. J. Leland, G. Owen Schaefer, Ezekiel Emanuel, Christopher Heath Wellman and Jonathan Wolff. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Philosophy Compass and Politics Philosophy & Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.