Anne Barnhill

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
53 papers, 668 citations indexed

About

Anne Barnhill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Barnhill has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 668 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Anne Barnhill's work include Obesity and Health Practices (9 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (7 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers). Anne Barnhill is often cited by papers focused on Obesity and Health Practices (9 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (7 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers). Anne Barnhill collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Anne Barnhill's co-authors include Justin Bernstein, Molly Sauer, Brian Wahl, Joseph Ali, Alain Labrique, Rupali J. Limaye, Matteo Bonotti, Ruth Faden, Tyler Doggett and Nancy Kass and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PEDIATRICS and American Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Anne Barnhill

48 papers receiving 617 citations

Hit Papers

Building trust while influencing online COVID-19 content ... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne Barnhill United States 13 185 159 157 91 69 53 668
Yael Keshet Israel 17 211 1.1× 109 0.7× 206 1.3× 111 1.2× 121 1.8× 72 829
Bob C. Mulder Netherlands 14 200 1.1× 91 0.6× 167 1.1× 84 0.9× 63 0.9× 33 662
Luís David Castiel Brazil 16 198 1.1× 105 0.7× 293 1.9× 78 0.9× 101 1.5× 110 773
Piia Jallinoja Finland 21 165 0.9× 406 2.6× 267 1.7× 138 1.5× 95 1.4× 66 1.4k
Áine McConnon Ireland 21 407 2.2× 259 1.6× 179 1.1× 98 1.1× 39 0.6× 28 1.0k
Georgina Cairns United Kingdom 11 193 1.0× 648 4.1× 137 0.9× 149 1.6× 80 1.2× 20 1.1k
Danielle McCarthy United Kingdom 10 238 1.3× 140 0.9× 184 1.2× 61 0.7× 85 1.2× 18 962
Annabelle Wilson Australia 19 300 1.6× 305 1.9× 252 1.6× 88 1.0× 157 2.3× 60 1.0k
James Kite Australia 18 240 1.3× 238 1.5× 193 1.2× 87 1.0× 146 2.1× 41 871
Emma Tonkin Australia 15 118 0.6× 221 1.4× 161 1.0× 32 0.4× 55 0.8× 31 951

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Barnhill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Barnhill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Barnhill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Barnhill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Barnhill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Barnhill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Barnhill. The network helps show where Anne Barnhill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Barnhill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Barnhill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Barnhill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Barnhill. Anne Barnhill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barnhill, Anne, et al.. (2025). ‘Why Do You Ask?’ Revisiting the Purpose of Eliciting the Public’s Moral Judgments About Emerging Technologies. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 16(3). 127–139.
2.
Conti, Costanza, Andy Hall, Kristiaan P.W. Kok, et al.. (2025). A quest for questions: The JUSTRA as a matrix for navigating just food system transformations in an era of uncertainty. One Earth. 8(2). 101178–101178. 3 indexed citations
3.
Barnhill, Anne, et al.. (2025). Views From State-Level Policy Actors About the US Federal Government COVID-19 Response. Health Security. 23(1). 1–8.
4.
Faden, Ruth, et al.. (2024). ‘Staying in the lane’ of public health? Boundary‐work in the roles of state health officials and experts in COVID‐19 policymaking. Sociology of Health & Illness. 46(5). 1004–1022. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bernstein, Justin, Anne Barnhill, & Ruth Faden. (2024). Ethical Tradeoffs in Public Health Emergency Crisis Communication. The American Journal of Bioethics. 24(4). 83–85.
6.
Blasimme, Alessandro, Rachel Gur‐Arie, Joseph Ali, et al.. (2022). Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 50(4). 791–804. 1 indexed citations
7.
Barnhill, Anne, Justin Bernstein, Ruth Faden, et al.. (2022). Moral Reasons for Individuals in High-Income Countries to Limit Beef Consumption. PubMed. 7(2). 11–11. 1 indexed citations
8.
Mason-D’Croz, Daniel, Anne Barnhill, Justin Bernstein, et al.. (2022). Ethical and economic implications of the adoption of novel plant-based beef substitutes in the USA: a general equilibrium modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health. 6(8). e658–e669. 27 indexed citations
9.
Geller, Gail, et al.. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 safer infection sites: moral entitlement, pragmatic harm reduction strategy or ethical outrage?. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47(12). e88–e88. 1 indexed citations
10.
Limaye, Rupali J., Molly Sauer, Joseph Ali, et al.. (2020). Building trust while influencing online COVID-19 content in the social media world. The Lancet Digital Health. 2(6). e277–e278. 235 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Grummon, Anna H., Marissa G. Hall, Jason P. Block, et al.. (2020). Ethical Considerations for Food and Beverage Warnings. Physiology & Behavior. 222. 112930–112930. 9 indexed citations
12.
Barnhill, Anne & Nicole Civita. (2020). Food Waste: Ethical Imperatives & Complexities. Physiology & Behavior. 223. 112927–112927. 6 indexed citations
13.
Barnhill, Anne. (2015). I’d Like to Teach the World to Think: Commercial Advertising and Manipulation. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1(1). 307–328. 10 indexed citations
14.
Barnhill, Anne, et al.. (2014). Fairness and respect in obesity prevention policies: a response to David Buchanan. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2(1). 49–50. 1 indexed citations
15.
Barnhill, Anne & Franklin G. Miller. (2014). Placebo and Deception: A Commentary. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 40(1). 69–82. 6 indexed citations
16.
Barnhill, Anne, et al.. (2013). Ethical Agreement and Disagreement About Obesity Prevention Policy in the United States. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
17.
Barnhill, Anne, et al.. (2013). Caffeine Content Labeling: A Missed Opportunity for Promoting Personal and Public Health. PubMed. 3(3). 108–113. 34 indexed citations
18.
Barnhill, Anne, et al.. (2013). Evaluating Equity Critiques in Food Policy: The Case of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 41(1). 301–309. 16 indexed citations
19.
Barnhill, Anne, et al.. (2013). Ethical Agreement and Disagreement about Obesity Prevention Policy in the United States. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 1(2). 117–120. 17 indexed citations
20.
Barnhill, Anne. (2011). What It Takes to Defend Deceptive Placebo Use. Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal. 21(3). 219–250. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026