Matthew S. Brook
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Exercise and Physiological Responses
Papers in
- Cell Biology 47
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition 44
-
- Sports Performance and Training 16
- Co-authors
- Philip J. AthertonDaniel J. WilkinsonKenneth SmithBethan E. PhillipsNathaniel J. SzewczykPaul L. GreenhaffWilliam K. MitchellJonathan N. Lund
- Journals
- Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle (6 papers)Clinical Nutrition (6 papers)GeroScience (4 papers)The FASEB Journal (4 papers)The Journal of Physiology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Matthew S. Brook
61 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Cell Biology 915
- Rehabilitation 267
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 305
- Physiology 820
- Complementary and alternative medicine 118
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew S. Brook
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew S. Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew S. Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew S. Brook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew S. Brook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew S. Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew S. Brook. The network helps show where Matthew S. Brook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew S. Brook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 73 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 124 |
About Matthew S. Brook
Matthew S. Brook is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation, Physiology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle metabolism and nutrition (44 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (23 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (18 papers), Sports Performance and Training (16 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (12 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (9 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (915 citations), Rehabilitation (267 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (305 citations), Physiology (820 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (118 citations). Matthew S. Brook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Philip J. Atherton, Daniel J. Wilkinson, Kenneth Smith, Bethan E. Phillips, Nathaniel J. Szewczyk, Paul L. Greenhaff, William K. Mitchell, Jonathan N. Lund, Andrew Philp and John P. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle, Clinical Nutrition, GeroScience, The FASEB Journal and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.