Philip J. Atherton
- Cell Biology top 0.02%
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition 150
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 0.1%
- Sports Performance and Training 49
- Rehabilitation top 0.05%
- Exercise and Physiological Responses 34
- Physiology top 0.05%
- Nutrition and Health in Aging 57
- Diet and metabolism studies 37
- Adipose Tissue and Metabolism 35
-
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology 35
-
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders 93
- Co-authors
- Kenneth SmithMichael J. RennieDaniel J. WilkinsonBethan E. PhillipsDebbie RankinJohn P. WilliamsJonathan N. LundWilliam K. Mitchell
- Journals
- Nucleic Acids Research (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Oncology (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Atherton
334 papers receiving 19.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
- Cell Biology 8.1k
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 3.4k
- Rehabilitation 2.5k
- Physiology 9.0k
- Complementary and alternative medicine 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Atherton
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Atherton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Atherton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Atherton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Atherton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Atherton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Atherton. The network helps show where Philip J. Atherton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip J. Atherton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 124 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 252 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 1 |
About Philip J. Atherton
Philip J. Atherton is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, having authored 347 papers that have together received 19.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle metabolism and nutrition (150 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (93 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (57 papers), Sports Performance and Training (49 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (37 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (35 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (35 papers) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (34 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (8.1k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (3.4k citations) and Rehabilitation (2.5k citations). Philip J. Atherton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Smith, Michael J. Rennie, Daniel J. Wilkinson, Bethan E. Phillips, Debbie Rankin, John P. Williams, Jonathan N. Lund, William K. Mitchell, Stuart M. Phillips and Anna Selby. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Nature Communications and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.