Colleen S. Deane
- Physiology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Aging top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Philip J. AthertonBethan E. PhillipsDavid C. HughesClaire E. StewartAdam P. SharplesTimothy EtheridgeNathaniel J. SzewczykColin Selman
- Topics
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders (18 papers)Muscle metabolism and nutrition (13 papers)Spaceflight effects on biology (12 papers)
- Cited by
- AgingPhysiologyRehabilitation
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of Physiology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Colleen S. Deane
39 papers receiving 834 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Physiology 468
- Molecular Biology 340
- Cell Biology 186
- Aging 122
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 114
Countries citing papers authored by Colleen S. Deane
This map shows the geographic impact of Colleen S. Deane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colleen S. Deane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colleen S. Deane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Colleen S. Deane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colleen S. Deane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colleen S. Deane. The network helps show where Colleen S. Deane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colleen S. Deane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colleen S. Deane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colleen S. Deane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colleen S. Deane. Colleen S. Deane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 73 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Colleen S. Deane
Colleen S. Deane is a scholar working on Aging, Physiology and Cell Biology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (18 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (13 papers) and Spaceflight effects on biology (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (122 citations), Physiology (468 citations) and Rehabilitation (99 citations). Colleen S. Deane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Philip J. Atherton, Bethan E. Phillips, David C. Hughes, Claire E. Stewart, Adam P. Sharples, Timothy Etheridge, Nathaniel J. Szewczyk, Colin Selman, Amarjit Saini and Kenneth Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.