Matthew Foster

23 total papers · 818 total citations
15 papers, 568 citations indexed

About

Matthew Foster is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew Foster has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 568 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Matthew Foster's work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (7 papers), Topic Modeling (4 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (3 papers). Matthew Foster is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (7 papers), Topic Modeling (4 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (3 papers). Matthew Foster collaborates with scholars based in United States. Matthew Foster's co-authors include Abhishek Pandey, Kory Kreimeyer, Taxiarchis Botsis, Richard A. Forshee, Mark Walderhaug, Sandra F. Jones, D. Craig Allred, Joyce E. Johnson, Sandy Olson and James L. Griffin and has published in prestigious journals such as Vaccine, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

In The Last Decade

Matthew Foster

15 papers receiving 551 citations

Hit Papers

Natural language processi... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Matthew Foster 228 188 89 74 70 15 568
Kory Kreimeyer 243 1.1× 174 0.9× 96 1.1× 81 1.1× 17 0.2× 16 562
Sandra F. Jones 209 0.9× 122 0.6× 88 1.0× 71 1.0× 28 0.4× 11 583
Fern FitzHenry 159 0.7× 129 0.7× 63 0.7× 188 2.5× 43 0.6× 24 678
Hanyin Wang 267 1.2× 88 0.5× 94 1.1× 71 1.0× 22 0.3× 23 575
Rupa Makadia 120 0.5× 114 0.6× 34 0.4× 66 0.9× 24 0.3× 12 588
Martin Seneviratne 238 1.0× 114 0.6× 128 1.4× 104 1.4× 68 1.0× 26 680
Yikuan Li 308 1.4× 76 0.4× 105 1.2× 81 1.1× 21 0.3× 21 576
Henk Harkema 401 1.8× 340 1.8× 16 0.2× 76 1.0× 81 1.2× 22 645
Joseph M. Plasek 126 0.6× 108 0.6× 39 0.4× 58 0.8× 22 0.3× 42 541
Sarah Sandmann 78 0.3× 193 1.0× 78 0.9× 49 0.7× 21 0.3× 40 567

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Foster. The network helps show where Matthew Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Foster. Matthew Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026