Mary Harlow
- Archeology top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Paleontology
- History top 10%
- Religious studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ray LaurenceMarie Louise Bech NoschPeter S. HarlowH. D. PattersonPaul RobertsCécile MichelVincent GaffneyAndrew V. Bradley
- Topics
- Fashion and Cultural Textiles (6 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mary Harlow
21 papers receiving 123 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Archeology 85
- Anthropology 51
- Paleontology 21
- History 15
- Religious studies 14
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Harlow
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Harlow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Harlow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Harlow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Harlow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Harlow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Harlow. The network helps show where Mary Harlow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Harlow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Harlow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Harlow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Harlow. Mary Harlow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Textile crafts and history | 1 |
| 4 | Spinning fates and the song of the loom : the use of textiles, clothing and cloth production as metaphor, symbol and narrative device in Greek and Latin literature | 10 |
| 5 | Greek and Roman textiles and dress : an interdisciplinary anthology | 10 |
| 6 | Prehistoric, Ancient Near Eastern and Aegean Textiles and Dress: an interdisciplinary anthology | 2 |
| 7 | Weaving the Threads: Methodologies in textile and dress research for the Greek and Roman World: the state of the art and the case for cross-disciplinarity | 3 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Dress and identity | 1 |
| 11 | De Amicitia: The Role of Age | 1 |
| 12 | Age and ageing in the Roman Empire | 16 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Old age in ancient Rome | 2 |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Mary Harlow
Mary Harlow is a scholar working on Museology, Archeology and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fashion and Cultural Textiles (6 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (85 citations), Anthropology (51 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (5 citations). Mary Harlow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ray Laurence, Marie Louise Bech Nosch, Peter S. Harlow, H. D. Patterson, Paul Roberts, Cécile Michel, Vincent Gaffney, Andrew V. Bradley, Dean Goodman and Salvatore Piro. Their work appears in journals such as Antiquity, Britannia and Journal of Roman Archaeology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.