Journal of Roman Archaeology

1.2k papers and 4.6k indexed citations

About

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology usually cover Archeology (822 papers), Anthropology (422 papers) and History (165 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (609 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (386 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (303 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Roman Archaeology are David Mattingly, Walter Scheidel, Anthony King, Richard Duncan-Jones, John Pearce, Greg Woolf, Marijke van der Veen, Kyle Harper, Michael McCormick and Andrew Wilson.

In The Last Decade

Journal of Roman Archaeology

676 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Roman Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Roman Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Roman Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026