Journal of Roman Archaeology

1.1k papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology usually cover Archeology (797 papers), Anthropology (410 papers) and History (157 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (591 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (376 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (292 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Roman Archaeology are Anthony King, David Mattingly, Walter Scheidel, Richard Duncan-Jones, John Pearce, Marijke van der Veen, Greg Woolf, Katherine M. D. Dunbabin, Michael McCormick and Andrew Wilson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Roman Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Roman Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Roman Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025