Journal of Roman Archaeology

5.3k citations
1.2k papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Archeology top 1%
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
    • Archaeological and Historical Studies
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
    • Archaeological Research and Protection

Papers in

    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 610
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 304
    • Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies 110
    • Archaeological and Historical Studies 100
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 93
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 80

Journal of Roman Archaeology

726 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Journal of Roman Archaeology
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Archeology 3.6k
  • Space and Planetary Science 394
  • Anthropology 2.0k
  • Paleontology 798
  • Classics 340
Replace Bulletin de correspondance hellénique with:
Bulletin de correspondance hellénique France
Hesperia The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens United States
The Annual of the British School at Athens United Kingdom
Britannia United Kingdom
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient United States
Comptes-rendus des séances de l année - Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres France
The Antiquaries Journal United Kingdom
Archaeological Journal United Kingdom
Mélanges de l École française de Rome Antiquité France
Oxford Journal of Archaeology United Kingdom
Journal of Roman Archaeology relative to Bulletin de correspondance hellénique France Bulletin de correspondance hellénique's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Bulletin de correspondance hellénique · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Roman Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Roman Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Roman Archaeology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology.

About Journal of Roman Archaeology

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology usually cover Archeology (825 papers), Space and Planetary Science (78 papers), Anthropology (425 papers), Classics (66 papers) and History (165 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (610 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (388 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (304 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (115 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (110 papers), Archaeological and Historical Studies (100 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (93 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Roman Archaeology are David Mattingly, Walter Scheidel, Anthony King, Richard Duncan-Jones, John Pearce, Greg Woolf, Marijke van der Veen, Katherine M. D. Dunbabin, Michael McCormick and Andrew Wilson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact