Antiquity

5.2k papers and 64.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.2k papers published in Antiquity in the last decades have received a total of 64.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Antiquity usually cover Archeology (2.0k papers), Paleontology (1.9k papers) and Anthropology (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (1.9k papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (875 papers) and Archaeological Remote Sensing using Remote Sensing Techniques (518 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Antiquity are Matthew Spriggs, Atholl Anderson, Thomas Higham, Colin Renfrew, Dorian Q. Fuller, Ian Hodder, R.M. Clark, Tjeerd H. van Andel, Michael P. Richards and Paul Taçon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Antiquity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Antiquity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Antiquity.

Countries where authors publish in Antiquity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Antiquity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Antiquity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antiquity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025