Mary Durham

1.8k citations
31 papers · 1.2k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mary Durham

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mary Durham
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 239
  • General Health Professions 466
  • Gender Studies 159
  • Applied Psychology 80
  • Social Psychology 273
Replace Gabrielle Jenkin with:
Gabrielle Jenkin New Zealand
Oliver Hämmig Switzerland
Gerard Jansen Netherlands
Tine Tjørnhøj‐Thomsen Denmark
Shonali Sud India
Tim Huijts Netherlands
Timo Sinervo Finland
Siw Tone Innstrand Norway
Cheryl Dellasega United States
Cassandra A. Okechukwu United States
Mary Durham relative to Gabrielle Jenkin New Zealand Gabrielle Jenkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Gabrielle Jenkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Durham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Durham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Durham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Durham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Durham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Durham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Durham. The network helps show where Mary Durham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Durham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Durham Line = papers co-authored together Mary Durham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993324
2 2008284
3 2008142
4 2015102
5 200264
6 200255
7 199541
8
The empirical consequences and policy implications of broadening the statutory criteria for civil commitment.
198531
9 198926
10 201625
11 200218
12 198216
13 199815
14 198613
15 198413
16 199512
17 198510
18 19869
19 19947
20 19987

About Mary Durham

Mary Durham is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (9 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (239 citations), General Health Professions (466 citations), Gender Studies (159 citations), Applied Psychology (80 citations) and Social Psychology (273 citations). Mary Durham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Leslie B. Hammer, Erin L. Kelly, Donald L. Patrick, David Grembowski, Ellen Ernst Kossek, Jeremy W. Bray, Lauren A. Murphy, Kelly Chermack, Julia Hecht and Paula Diehr. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Health Affairs, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, Academy of Management Annals and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact