Mary C. Anderson

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Mary C. Anderson is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary C. Anderson has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Mary C. Anderson's work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers). Mary C. Anderson is often cited by papers focused on Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers). Mary C. Anderson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Switzerland. Mary C. Anderson's co-authors include Keith W. Thiede, David J. Therriault, Jennifer Wiley, Thomas D. Griffin, John M. McCrodden, Keith F. Tipton, Brian M. Davis, Joanne H. Carlson, Joseph Ayers and Sidney B. Simpson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Biochemical Pharmacology and Experimental Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Mary C. Anderson

18 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of ... 2003 2026 2010 2018 2003 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary C. Anderson United States 13 774 384 285 284 221 18 1.3k
Maria Mody United States 20 928 1.2× 365 1.0× 1.3k 4.7× 119 0.4× 104 0.5× 47 2.4k
Stephen M. Edelson United States 17 438 0.6× 131 0.3× 713 2.5× 93 0.3× 180 0.8× 33 1.3k
John P. Houston United States 25 197 0.3× 341 0.9× 330 1.2× 139 0.5× 71 0.3× 121 2.1k
Marie Poirier United Kingdom 25 676 0.9× 271 0.7× 1.3k 4.6× 28 0.1× 274 1.2× 85 2.0k
Jessica M. Logan Australia 16 323 0.4× 219 0.6× 1.1k 3.9× 40 0.1× 171 0.8× 41 1.8k
Ralph Radach Germany 27 1.6k 2.1× 536 1.4× 1.5k 5.2× 154 0.5× 530 2.4× 79 2.6k
Sashank Varma United States 18 709 0.9× 255 0.7× 1.3k 4.5× 532 1.9× 153 0.7× 54 2.2k
Chris Wetzel United States 11 544 0.7× 131 0.3× 261 0.9× 202 0.7× 149 0.7× 18 1.1k
Dai Zhang China 21 269 0.3× 82 0.2× 486 1.7× 604 2.1× 27 0.1× 51 2.1k
Susan Murtha Canada 18 251 0.3× 161 0.4× 847 3.0× 283 1.0× 14 0.1× 31 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary C. Anderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary C. Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary C. Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary C. Anderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary C. Anderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary C. Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary C. Anderson. The network helps show where Mary C. Anderson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary C. Anderson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary C. Anderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary C. Anderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary C. Anderson. Mary C. Anderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Jacobson, Richard A., et al.. (2015). The impact of visiting student electives on surgical Match outcomes. Journal of Surgical Research. 196(2). 209–215. 19 indexed citations
2.
Brown, Marie T., Alfredo J Mena Lora, Mary C. Anderson, & Christine A. Sinsky. (2015). Resolving patients' vaccination uncertainty: going from "no thanks!" to "of course!".. PubMed. 21(2). 22–6. 1 indexed citations
3.
Daly, Shaun, Rebecca Deal, Daniel Rinewalt, et al.. (2013). Higher clinical performance during a surgical clerkship is independently associated with matriculation of medical students into general surgery. The American Journal of Surgery. 207(4). 623–627. 8 indexed citations
4.
Ross, Louie E., et al.. (2012). Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among men with a history of prostate cancer.. PubMed. 19(4). 143–50. 4 indexed citations
5.
Thiede, Keith W., Thomas D. Griffin, Jennifer Wiley, & Mary C. Anderson. (2010). Poor Metacomprehension Accuracy as a Result of Inappropriate Cue Use. Discourse Processes. 47(4). 331–362. 140 indexed citations
6.
Anderson, Mary C. & Keith W. Thiede. (2007). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy?. Acta Psychologica. 128(1). 110–118. 71 indexed citations
7.
Thiede, Keith W., Mary C. Anderson, & David J. Therriault. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95(1). 66–73. 28 indexed citations
8.
Thiede, Keith W. & Mary C. Anderson. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 28(2). 129–160. 179 indexed citations
9.
Thiede, Keith W., Mary C. Anderson, & David J. Therriault. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95(1). 66–73. 558 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
McCarron, Mary, et al.. (1998). Cognitive Decline in Down Syndrome: A Validity/Reliability Study of the Test for Severe Impairment. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 103(2). 193–193. 23 indexed citations
11.
Fitzgerald‐Hughes, Deirdre, Keith F. Tipton, Mary C. Anderson, & Brian Lawlor. (1996). Substrate specificity of human platelet monoamine oxidase B activity in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. Biochemical Society Transactions. 24(1). 63S–63S. 1 indexed citations
12.
Lawlor, Brian & Mary C. Anderson. (1995). The neurobiology of late-life depression: Impact of silent cerebrovascular disease. Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental. 10(S4). S223–S227. 2 indexed citations
13.
Anderson, Mary C., et al.. (1993). Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and the cheese effect. Neurochemical Research. 18(11). 1145–1149. 132 indexed citations
14.
Adelman, Lester S., et al.. (1993). CT-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy of Nonenhancing Brain Lesions. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. 61(3). 105–117. 29 indexed citations
15.
Anderson, Mary C., P. C. Waldmeier, & Keith F. Tipton. (1991). The inhibition of monoamine oxidase by brofaromine. Biochemical Pharmacology. 41(12). 1871–1877. 19 indexed citations
16.
Davis, Brian M., et al.. (1990). Time course of salamander spinal cord regeneration and recovery of swimming: HRP retrograde pathway tracing and kinematic analysis. Experimental Neurology. 108(3). 198–213. 68 indexed citations
17.
O’Carroll, Anne‐Marie, et al.. (1989). Determination of the absolute concentrations of mono amine oxidase A and B in human tissues. Biochemical Pharmacology. 38(6). 901–905. 24 indexed citations
18.
Gómez, Néstor, Mercedes Unzeta, Keith F. Tipton, Mary C. Anderson, & Anne‐Marie O’Carroll. (1986). Determination of monoamine oxidase concentrations in rat liver by inhibitor binding. Biochemical Pharmacology. 35(24). 4467–4472. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026