Marlene V. Strege
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Education
- Co-authors
- John A. RicheyThomas H. OllendickSusan W. WhiteEmma CondyAngela ScarpaReina S. FactorJungmeen Kim‐SpoonLigia Antezana
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Marlene V. Strege
21 papers receiving 341 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 196
- Clinical Psychology 187
- Cognitive Neuroscience 159
- Psychiatry and Mental health 54
- Education 43
Countries citing papers authored by Marlene V. Strege
This map shows the geographic impact of Marlene V. Strege's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlene V. Strege with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlene V. Strege more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marlene V. Strege
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlene V. Strege. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlene V. Strege. The network helps show where Marlene V. Strege may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marlene V. Strege
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marlene V. Strege. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marlene V. Strege based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marlene V. Strege. Marlene V. Strege is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | Integrating Neuroscience Into Clinical Practice: Current Opinions and Dialogue Between Drs. Jacqueline Persons and Kerry Ressler | 2 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Marlene V. Strege
Marlene V. Strege is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (196 citations), Clinical Psychology (187 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (159 citations). Marlene V. Strege has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John A. Richey, Thomas H. Ollendick, Susan W. White, Emma Condy, Angela Scarpa, Reina S. Factor, Jungmeen Kim‐Spoon, Ligia Antezana, Nader Amir and Jennie M. Kuckertz. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Psychological Medicine and Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.