Victoria Choate
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Amanda E. GuyerEric E. NelsonDaniel S. PineNathan A. FoxMonique ErnstBrenda E. BensonKoraly Pérez‐EdgarAllison Detloff
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent PsychiatryDevelopment and Psychopathology
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Victoria Choate
6 papers receiving 443 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 237
- Clinical Psychology 223
- Cognitive Neuroscience 204
- Social Psychology 123
- Psychiatry and Mental health 65
Countries citing papers authored by Victoria Choate
This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria Choate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria Choate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria Choate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria Choate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria Choate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria Choate. The network helps show where Victoria Choate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria Choate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria Choate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria Choate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria Choate. Victoria Choate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 65 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 132 | |
| 6 | 179 |
About Victoria Choate
Victoria Choate is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (237 citations), Clinical Psychology (223 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (204 citations). Victoria Choate has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Amanda E. Guyer, Eric E. Nelson, Daniel S. Pine, Nathan A. Fox, Monique Ernst, Brenda E. Benson, Koraly Pérez‐Edgar, Allison Detloff, Paul G. Nestor and Johanna M. Jarcho. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Development and Psychopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.