Mark Whittow
Impact in
- Classics top 2%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Archeology top 5%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Papers in
- Classics 8
- Byzantine Studies and History 8
-
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 6
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 2
- Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 1
- Co-authors
- Zeev Rubin (1 shared paper)Shaun Tougher (1 shared paper)Dimitri A. Korobeinikov (1 shared paper)Paul Magdalino (1 shared paper)Walter Emil Kaegi (1 shared paper)Michael Angold (1 shared paper)Paul Stephenson (1 shared paper)Andrew Louth (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Past & Present (2 papers)Anatolian Studies (2 papers)The English Historical Review (1 paper)Journal of Roman Archaeology (1 paper)Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark Whittow
14 papers receiving 107 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Classics 75
- Archeology 74
- Anthropology 68
- History 36
- Space and Planetary Science 4
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Whittow
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Whittow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Whittow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Whittow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Whittow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Whittow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Whittow. The network helps show where Mark Whittow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Whittow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 7 | The making of Byzantium, 600-1025 | 1996 | 6 |
| 8 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | Heraclius, Emperor of Byzantium | 2006 | 2 |
| 12 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 1 |
About Mark Whittow
Mark Whittow is a scholar working on Classics, Archeology, Anthropology, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (8 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (5 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper) and History and Cultural Heritage (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (75 citations), Archeology (74 citations), Anthropology (68 citations), History (36 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (4 citations). Mark Whittow has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Zeev Rubin, Shaun Tougher, Dimitri A. Korobeinikov, Paul Magdalino, Walter Emil Kaegi, Michael Angold, Paul Stephenson, Andrew Louth, R. W. Thomson and S. I. Ivanov. Their work appears in journals such as Past & Present, Anatolian Studies, The English Historical Review, Journal of Roman Archaeology and Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.